ArticleJournal of eating disorders2021
Can adolescents with eating disorders be treated in primary care? A retrospective clinical cohort study.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adolescent anorexia nervosa treated in primary care with a family-based method - long-term outcomes.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- TransitionED: A protocol for Co-designing and implementing Canadian practice guidelines for transitions for youth with eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025Article
- Managing adolescent eating disorders in primary care: a qualitative study of provider perspectives.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Transitions for youth and young adults with eating disorders and/or other mental health conditions: a Canadian guideline.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Review
- Description of patients with eating disorders by general practitioners: a cohort study and focus on co-management with depression.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- How best to support parents of children with an eating disorder: A commentary on Wilksch (2023).The International journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- Adoption of inpatient family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa: A case report.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Article
- A Clinical Overview of Anorexia Nervosa and Overcoming Treatment Resistance.Avicenna journal of medicine · 2023Review
- Partnerships with primary care providers: Opportunities to prevent eating disorders and mitigate their progression in young people.Eating disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily-Based Treatment (FBT) is considered the first-line intervention for adolescent anorexia nervosa. However, access to this treatment is limited. Treatment programs for other pediatric mental health conditions have successfully overcome barriers to accessing evidence-based intervention by integrating mental health services into primary care. This study evaluated the proof-of-concept of a novel modification of FBT, Family-Based Treatment for Primary Care (FBT-PC) for adolescent restrictive eating disorders designed for delivery by primary care providers in their practices.
methodsThis retrospective clinical cohort study evaluated 15 adolescents with restrictive eating disorders receiving FBT-PC and 15 adolescents receiving standard FBT. We examined improvement in BMI percentile, reduction in weight suppression, and clinical benchmarks of eating disorder recovery including weight restoration to > 95% of expected body weight (EBW) and resolution of DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders.
resultsIn both groups, effect sizes for increased BMI percentile exceeded Cohen's convention for a large effect (FBT-PC: d = .94; standard FBT: d = 1.15) as did effect sizes for reduction in weight suppression (FBT-PC: d = 1.83; standard FBT: d = 1.21). At the end of treatment, 80% of the FBT-PC cohort and 87% in the standard FBT group achieved > 95%EBW and 67% in the FBT-PC group and 60% in the standard FBT group no longer met DSM-5 criteria for an eating disorder. There were no cohort differences in the number of treatment drop-outs or referrals to a more intensive level of eating disorder treatment.
conclusionsFindings suggest that primary care providers have potential to improve weight and clinical status in adolescents with restrictive eating disorders. Based on these results, more rigorous testing of the FBT-PC model is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.