Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33892725›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2021

Semantic segmentation of human oocyte images using deep neural networks.

Anna Targosz, Piotr Przystałka, Ryszard Wiaderkiewicz, Grzegorz Mrugacz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review of artificial intelligence applications in in vitro fertilization.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna TargoszDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Silesia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, 18 Medyków St., 40-752, Katowice, Poland. atargosz@klinikabocian.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-9730
Piotr PrzystałkaDepartment of Fundamentals of Machinery Design, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 18a Konarskiego St., 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3412-4533
Ryszard WiaderkiewiczDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Silesia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, 18 Medyków St., 40-752, Katowice, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7309-0121
Grzegorz MrugaczCenter for Reproductive Medicine Bocian, 26 Akademicka St., 15-267, Białystok, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-4817
Medical University of Silesia · PLNew York Academy of Medicine · USSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyzszego CTT/1344/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfertility is a significant problem of humanity. In vitro fertilisation is one of the most effective and frequently applied ART methods. The effectiveness IVF depends on the assessment and selection of gametes and embryo with the highest developmental potential. The subjective nature of morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos is still one of the main reasons for seeking effective and objective methods for assessing quality in automatic manner. The most promising methods to automatic classification of oocytes and embryos are based on image analysis aided by machine learning techniques. The special attention is paid on deep neural networks that can be used as classifiers solving the problem of automatic assessment of the oocytes/embryos.

methodsThis paper deals with semantic segmentation of human oocyte images using deep neural networks in order to develop new version of the predefined neural networks. Deep semantic oocyte segmentation networks can be seen as medically oriented predefined networks understanding the content of the image. The research presented in the paper is focused on the performance comparison of different types of convolutional neural networks for semantic oocyte segmentation. In the case study, the merits and limitations of the selected deep neural networks are analysed.

results71 deep neural models were analysed. The best score was obtained for one of the variants of DeepLab-v3-ResNet-18 model, when the training accuracy (Acc) reached about 85% for training patterns and 79% for validation ones. The weighted intersection over union (wIoU) and global accuracy (gAcc) for test patterns were calculated, as well. The obtained values of these quality measures were 0,897 and 0.93, respectively.

conclusionThe obtained results prove that the proposed approach can be applied to create deep neural models for semantic oocyte segmentation with the high accuracy guaranteeing their usage as the predefined networks in other tasks.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerOocytesSemanticsDeep LearningHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep neural networksHuman oocyteImage analysisIVFSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID33892725
PMCPMC8066497
OpenAlexW3155010371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.