Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33892722›Full record

Trial reportReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2021

The effect of Myo-inositol on fertility rates in poor ovarian responder in women undergoing assisted reproductive technique: a randomized clinical trial.

Sahar Mohammadi, Fatemeh Eini, Fatemeh Bazarganipour, Seyed Abdolvahab Taghavi, Maryam Azizi Kutenaee

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Oocyte and dietary supplements: a mini review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Inositols: From Established Knowledge to Novel Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sahar MohammadiFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Fatemeh EiniFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Fatemeh BazarganipourSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Seyed Abdolvahab TaghaviSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Maryam Azizi KutenaeeFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. Maryamazizikut86@gmail.com.
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences · IRYasuj University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor ovarian response to gonadotropin is a significant challenge in assisted reproductive technique (ART) and affect 9-24% of ART cycles. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Myo-inositol on fertility rates in poor ovarian responder women undergoing assisted reproductive technique.

methodsThis study is a double-blinded randomized controlled study that involved 60 poor ovarian responders included in an ICSI program and divided into two groups; intervention group: 30 patients who have been assuming Inofolic (4 g myo-inositol + 400 μg folic acid) for the before the enrollment day; control group: 30 patients assuming folic acid (400 μg) for the same period. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed in the same manner in the two groups. The main outcomeswere the assessment of oocytes retrievednumber and quality, ovarian sensitivity index,required dose of Gonadotropinsunits × 1000), fertilization rate, biochemical, and clinical pregnancy rate.

resultThere is no significant difference in clinical characteristics between study groups. The number of oocytes retrieved, number of MII oocytes, number of embryos transferred, chemical, and clinical pregnancy were higher in the intervention group. However, they are not statistically significant in comparison to the control group. The ovarian sensitivity index and fertilization rate were significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group (P > 0.05). The required dose of gonadotropin significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group.

conclusionOur results suggest that the supplementation myo-inositol in poor ovarian responders significantly improved the ART outcomes such as fertilization rate gonadotropin, ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) and significantly reduced the required unities of gonadotropin. Additionally, more extensive randomized controlled studies are needed.

trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20180515039668N1 , retrospectively registered since 2020-03-16.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFertilizationFolic AcidHumansInfertility, FemaleInositolIranOocytesOvaryPregnancyPregnancy RateTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFolic AcidInositolIVF, Myo-inositolOvarian sensitivity indexPoor-responder

Identifiers

PMID33892722
PMCPMC8063404
OpenAlexW3155226311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.