ArticleBMC health services research2021
Electronic patient record and its effects on social aspects of interprofessional collaboration and clinical workflows in hospitals (eCoCo): a mixed methods study protocol.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Community Health Workers' Attitudes toward Collaborative Practice in the Care of Older Adults: An In-Service Training Intervention Trial in the Philippines.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Effects of electronic health records implementation on workflow and health care provider outcomes: a prospective, multi-professional cohort study.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Computer-assisted medical history taking prior to patient consultation in the outpatient care setting: a prospective pilot project.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Differences in changes of data completeness after the implementation of an electronic medical record in three surgical departments of a German hospital-a longitudinal comparative document analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Roger's diffusion of innovations theory and the adoption of a patient portal's digital anamnesis collection tool: study protocol for the MAiBest project.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- "So at least now I know how to deal with things myself, what I can do if it gets really bad again"-experiences with a long-term cross-sectoral advocacy care and case management for severe multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record in a German Hospital and the Change in Completeness of Documentation: Longitudinal Document Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Innovative solutions for disease management.Bioelectronic medicine · 2023Article
- The effects of digitalisation on health and social care work: a qualitative descriptive study of the perceptions of professionals and managers.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- SWOT Analysis and Expert Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Introduction of Healthcare Information Systems in Polyclinics in Aktobe, Kazakhstan.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2022Article
- The Interplay of Work, Digital Health Usage, and the Perceived Effects of Digitalization on Physicians' Work: Network Analysis Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Commentary: Quantifying the health needs of migrants in vulnerable circumstances registered with a nurse-led primary care service.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2022Article
- Management of Medico-Legal Risks in Digital Health Era: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe need for and usage of electronic patient records within hospitals has steadily increased over the last decade for economic reasons as well as the proceeding digitalization. While there are numerous benefits from this system, the potential risks of using electronic patient records for hospitals, patients and healthcare professionals must also be discussed. There is a lack in research, particularly regarding effects on healthcare professionals and their daily work in health services. The study eCoCo aims to gain insight into changes in interprofessional collaboration and clinical workflows resulting from introducing electronic patient records.
methodseCoCo is a multi-center case study integrating mixed methods from qualitative and quantitative social research. The case studies include three hospitals that undergo the process of introducing electronic patient records. Data are collected before and after the introduction of electronic patient records using participant observation, interviews, focus groups, time measurement, patient and employee questionnaires and a questionnaire to measure the level of digitalization. Furthermore, documents (patient records) as well as structural and administrative data are gathered. To analyze the interprofessional collaboration qualitative network analyses, reconstructive-hermeneutic analyses and document analyses are conducted. The workflow analyses, patient and employee assessment analyses and classification within the clinical adoption meta-model are conducted to provide insights into clinical workflows. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to investigate the effects of introducing electronic patient records on interprofessional collaboration and clinical workflows from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Thereby, it will consider patients' safety, legal and ethical concerns and quality of care. The results will help to understand the organization and thereby improve the performance of health services working with electronic patient records.
trial registrationThe study was registered at the German clinical trials register (DRKS00023343, Pre-Results) on November 17, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.