Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33892658›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Criterion validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Hungarian short form against the RM42 accelerometer.

Pongrác Ács, Réka Veress, Paulo Rocha, Tamás Dóczi, Bence László Raposa, Petra Baumann, Sergej Ostojic, Viktória Pérmusz, Alexandra Makai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Sports participation & childhood neurocognitive development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pongrác ÁcsFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, Pécs, H-7621, Hungary.
Réka VeressHungarian Leisure Sport Association, Istvánmezei út 1-3, Budapest, H-1146, Hungary.
Paulo RochaInstituto Português do Desporto e Juventud, 1990-100, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tamás DócziUniversity of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence László RaposaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, Pécs, H-7621, Hungary.
Petra BaumannFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, Pécs, H-7621, Hungary.
Sergej OstojicFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, Pécs, H-7621, Hungary.
Viktória Pérmusz *Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, Pécs, H-7621, Hungary.
Alexandra Makai *Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, Pécs, H-7621, Hungary. alexandra.makai@etk.pte.hu.ORCID 0000-0002-1907-120X

Funding

Hungarian Scientific Research Fund HRDOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity is a global phenomenon in European welfare countries. Proper monitoring is essential to measure the physical activity level of the population.

methodsIn the Hungarian cohort of the European Physical Activity and Sport Monitoring System (EUPASMOS) project, our participants (N = 598) completed sociodemographic questions and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAQ-SF) survey. The validity and reliability of the subjective measurement tool were examined, IPAQ-SF outcomes were contrasted against triaxial RM42 accelerometer wore for 7 consecutive days.

resultsThe IPAQ-SF showed moderate internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha = 0.647). The concurrent validity of the IPAQ-SF to triaxial accelerometer indicated a significant weak-to-moderate correlation (R = 0.111-0.338, p = 0.042; p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability showed a significant correlation between two measurements (R = 0.788-0.981, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe Hungarian version of the IPAQ-SF had excellent test-retest reliability, but low-to-fair concurrent validity for moderate and vigorous physical activity, walking and sitting time, as compared to the objective criterion measure among Hungarian adults.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseAdultEuropeHumansHungaryReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAccelerometerEUPASMOSIPAQ-SFMonitoringPhysical activityRM42Validation

Identifiers

PMID33892658
PMCPMC8062944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.