Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33892506›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Effects of kinship correction on inflation of genetic interaction statistics in commonly used mouse populations.

Anna L Tyler, Baha El Kassaby, Georgi Kolishovski, Jake Emerson, Ann E Wells, J Matthew Mahoney, Gregory W Carter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna L TylerThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Baha El KassabyThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Georgi KolishovskiThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Jake EmersonThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Ann E WellsThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
J Matthew MahoneyThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Gregory W CarterThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.
Jackson Laboratory · US

Funding

TREAT AD Structural Biology CoreU54AG065187 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALLAN I LEVEY · 2019 to 2026
$69.7M
Methods and Tools to Analyze Genetic ComplexityR01GM115518 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CARTER, GREGORY W · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG065187NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well understood that variation in relatedness among individuals, or kinship, can lead to false genetic associations. Multiple methods have been developed to adjust for kinship while maintaining power to detect true associations. However, relatively unstudied are the effects of kinship on genetic interaction test statistics. Here, we performed a survey of kinship effects on studies of six commonly used mouse populations. We measured inflation of main effect test statistics, genetic interaction test statistics, and interaction test statistics reparametrized by the Combined Analysis of Pleiotropy and Epistasis (CAPE). We also performed linear mixed model (LMM) kinship corrections using two types of kinship matrix: an overall kinship matrix calculated from the full set of genotyped markers, and a reduced kinship matrix, which left out markers on the chromosome(s) being tested. We found that test statistic inflation varied across populations and was driven largely by linkage disequilibrium. In contrast, there was no observable inflation in the genetic interaction test statistics. CAPE statistics were inflated at a level in between that of the main effects and the interaction effects. The overall kinship matrix overcorrected the inflation of main effect statistics relative to the reduced kinship matrix. The two types of kinship matrices had similar effects on the interaction statistics and CAPE statistics, although the overall kinship matrix trended toward a more severe correction. In conclusion, we recommend using an LMM kinship correction for both main effects and genetic interactions and further recommend that the kinship matrix be calculated from a reduced set of markers in which the chromosomes being tested are omitted from the calculation. This is particularly important in populations with substantial population structure, such as recombinant inbred lines in which genomic replicates are used.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumMiceModels, Geneticepistasiskinshiplinear mixed model

Identifiers

PMID33892506
PMCPMC8496251
OpenAlexW3132058724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.