Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33892499›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2021

Carbon Nanotube Exposure Triggers a Cerebral Peptidomic Response: Barrier Compromise, Neuroinflammation, and a Hyperexcited State.

Ekaterina Mostovenko, Samantha Saunders, Pretal P Muldoon, Lindsey Bishop, Matthew J Campen, Aaron Erdely, Andrew K Ottens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ekaterina MostovenkoDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Samantha SaundersDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Pretal P MuldoonDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Lindsey BishopPathology and Physiology Research Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, USA.
Matthew J CampenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
Aaron ErdelyPathology and Physiology Research Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, USA.
Andrew K OttensDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-3796
Virginia Commonwealth University · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Vascular Toxicity from Inhaled ToxicantsR01ES014639 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J · 2008 to 2023
$6.7M
Endothelial Cells as Biosensors for Occupational Cardiovascular RiskR21OH010495 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J · 2013 to 2014
$415k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014639NIOSH CDC HHS R01OH010495NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH010495NTRC 939ZXFL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique physicochemical properties of carbon nanomaterials and their ever-growing utilization generate a serious concern for occupational risk. Pulmonary exposure to these nanoparticles induces local and systemic inflammation, cardiovascular dysfunction, and even cognitive deficits. Although multiple routes of extrapulmonary toxicity have been proposed, the mechanism for and manner of neurologic effects remain minimally understood. Here, we examine the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF)-derived peptidomic fraction as a reflection of neuropathological alterations induced by pulmonary carbon nanomaterial exposure. Male C57BL/6 mice were exposed to 10 or 40 µg of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) by oropharyngeal aspiration. Serum and CSFs were collected 4 h post exposure. An enriched peptide fraction of both biofluids was analyzed using ion mobility-enabled data-independent mass spectrometry for label-free quantification. MWCNT exposure induced a prominent peptidomic response in the blood and CSF; however, correlation between fluids was limited. Instead, we determined that a MWCNT-induced peptidomic shift occurred specific to the CSF with 292 significant responses found that were not in serum. Identified MWCNT-responsive peptides depicted a mechanism involving aberrant fibrinolysis (fibrinopeptide A), blood-brain barrier permeation (homeobox protein A4), neuroinflammation (transmembrane protein 131L) with reactivity by astrocytes and microglia, and a pro-degradative (signal transducing adapter molecule, phosphoglycerate kinase), antiplastic (AF4/FMR2 family member 1, vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 18) state with the excitation-inhibition balance shifted to a hyperexcited (microtubule-associated protein 1B) phenotype. Overall, the significant pathologic changes observed were consistent with early neurodegenerative disease and were diagnostically reflected in the CSF peptidome.

Indexed as

Nanotubes, CarbonNeurodegenerative DiseasesAnimalsInflammationLungMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanotubes, Carbonblood-brain barriercarbon nanotubescerebrospinal fluidexcitotoxicitymass spectrometrynanoparticlesneurodegenerative diseaseneuroinflammationpeptidomepeptidomics

Identifiers

PMID33892499
PMCPMC8363048
OpenAlexW3154352730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.