Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891879›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2021

Feeding during neonatal therapeutic hypothermia, assessed using routinely collected National Neonatal Research Database data: a retrospective, UK population-based cohort study.

Chris Gale, Nicholas T Longford, Dusha Jeyakumaran, Kayleigh Ougham, Cheryl Battersby, Shalini Ojha, Jon Dorling

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03278847 (Optimising Newborn Nutrition During Therapeutic Hypothermia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03278847 completednot on this map

Optimising Newborn Nutrition During Therapeutic Hypothermia: an Observational Study Using Routinely Collected Data

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2010 to 2021Enrolled6,030ConditionsInfant, Newborn, Asphyxia Neonatorum, Hypothermia, Induced, Parenteral NutritionArmsReceived enteral (milk) feeds during therapeutic hypothermia, Enteral (milk) feeds withheld during therapeutic hypothermia, Received parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia, Did not receive parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Growth trajectories and need for oral feeding support among infants with neonatal encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, UK. Electronic address: christopher.gale@imperial.ac.uk.
Nicholas T LongfordNeonatal Data Analysis Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, UK.
Dusha JeyakumaranNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, UK.
Kayleigh OughamNeonatal Data Analysis Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, UK.
Cheryl BattersbyNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, UK.
Shalini OjhaDivision of Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jon DorlingDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Imperial College London · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health 16/79/13Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic hypothermia is standard of care in high-income countries for babies born with signs of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, but optimal feeding during treatment is uncertain and practice is variable. This study aimed to assess the association between feeding during therapeutic hypothermia and clinically important outcomes.

methodsWe did a population-level retrospective cohort study using the UK National Neonatal Research Database. We included all babies admitted to National Health Service neonatal units in England, Scotland, and Wales between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2017, who received therapeutic hypothermia for 72 h or died during this period. For analysis, we created matched groups using propensity scores and compared outcomes in babies who were fed versus unfed enterally during therapeutic hypothermia. The primary outcome was severe necrotising enterocolitis, either confirmed at surgery or causing death. Secondary outcomes include pragmatically defined necrotising enterocolitis (a recorded diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis in babies who received at least 5 consecutive days of antibiotics while also nil by mouth during their neonatal unit stay), late-onset infection (pragmatically defined as 5 consecutive days of antibiotic treatment commencing after day 3), survival to discharge, measures of breastmilk feeding, and length of stay in neonatal unit.

findings6030 babies received therapeutic hypothermia, of whom 1873 (31·1%) were fed during treatment. Seven (0·1%) babies were diagnosed with severe necrotising enterocolitis and the number was too small for further analyses. We selected 3236 (53·7%) babies for the matched feeding analysis (1618 pairs), achieving a good balance for all recorded background variables. Pragmatically defined necrotising enterocolitis was rare in both groups (incidence 0·5%, 95% CI 0·2-0·9] in the fed group vs 1·1% [0·7-1·4] in the unfed group). The enterally fed group had fewer pragmatically defined late-onset infections (difference -11·6% [95% CI -14·0 to -9·3]; p<0·0001), higher survival to discharge (5·2% [3·9-6·6]; p<0·0001), higher proportion of breastfeeding at discharge (8·0% [5·1-10·8]; p<0·0001), and shorter neonatal unit stays (-2·2 [-3·0 to -1·2] days; p<0·0001) compared with the unfed group.

interpretationNecrotising enterocolitis is rare in babies receiving therapeutic hypothermia. Enteral feeding during hypothermia is safe and associated with beneficial outcomes compared with not feeding, although residual confounding could not be completely ruled out. Our findings support starting milk feeds during therapeutic hypothermia.

fundingUK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme 16/79/13.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEnglandEnteral NutritionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleGestational AgeHumansHypothermia, InducedHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainIncidenceInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleMilk, Human

Identifiers

PMID33891879
PMCPMC8131202
OpenAlexW3155999659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.