Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891783›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Who, me? Optimism bias about US teenagers' ability to quit vaping.

Kiersten Strombotne, Jody Sindelar, John Buckell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kiersten StrombotneDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-7211
Jody SindelarDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1741-5451
John BuckellHealth Economics Research Center, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Health Behaviours, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-4217
Boston University · USUniversity of Oxford · GBYale New Haven Health System · US

Funding

Yale Center for the Study of Tobacco Product Use and Addiction (YCSTP) Project 2: Addictive Threshold of Nicotine and the Impact of SweetenersU54DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA M FUCITO · 2018 to 2026
$41.6M
Yale Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceP50DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRISHNAN-SARIN, SUCHITRA, O'MALLEY, STEPHANIE S · 2013 to 2017
$20.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036151NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe vaping rate among US teenagers has doubled in the last 2 years, which may be explained in part by teenagers' optimism that they would have relatively little trouble in quitting. The aim of this study was to estimate the extent to which teenagers exhibited optimism bias, what characteristics are associated with optimism bias and which factors are related to respondents' perceptions of how hard it would be for them to quit.

designA national, on-line, cross-sectional survey in 2018 using quota sampling.

settingUnited States.

participantsRespondents were 1610 teenagers aged 14-18 years who had ever tried or heard of JUULs or e-cigarettes generally. MEASUREMENTS: Optimism bias was defined as respondents' perceptions of their own difficulty quitting vaping compared with that of an average US person of their own age. Linear regression was used to examine associations between respondents' characteristics with both optimism bias and their own perceived difficulty quitting vaping.

findingsMore than 60% of teenagers were optimistically biased about their ability to quit vaping. Smoking (b = -0.69, P < 0.01) and JUULing (b = -0.62, P < 0.01) were negatively associated with optimism bias but reduced-price school lunch eligibility (0.27, P = 0.02) and school satisfaction were positively associated (b = 0.05, P = 0.02). Smoking (b = 0.85, P < 0.01) was associated with an increased perception of the difficulty of quitting. That association was negative for black respondents (b = -0.81, P = 0.01) and those eligible for reduced-priced lunches (b = -0.48, P = 0.01), and positive for Hispanic respondents (b = 0.47, P = 0.04).

conclusionsOn average, US teenagers appear to show optimism bias about their ability to quit vaping, which decreases with smoking and vaping and increases with eligibility for reduced-price school lunches.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesHumansAdolescentselectronic nicotine delivery servicesJUULoptimism biaspublic policyrisk perceptions

Identifiers

PMID33891783
PMCPMC8492482
OpenAlexW3153762031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.