Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891778›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2021

Image Quality Assessment of Fetal Brain MRI Using Multi-Instance Deep Learning Methods.

Axel Largent, Kushal Kapse, Scott D Barnett, Josepheen De Asis-Cruz, Matthew Whitehead, Jonathan Murnick, Li Zhao, Nicole Andersen, Jessica Quistorff, Catherine Lopez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Image Quality Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Skin Images.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Axel LargentDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0336-6350
Kushal KapseDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Scott D BarnettDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Josepheen De Asis-CruzDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Matthew WhiteheadDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jonathan MurnickDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Li ZhaoDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Nicole AndersenDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jessica QuistorffDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Catherine LopezDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Catherine LimperopoulosDeveloping Brain Institute, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Children's National · USGeorge Washington University Hospital · US

Funding

Antecedents of Impaired Brain Development in Fetuses with Heart DiseaseR01HL116585 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIMPEROPOULOS, CATHERINE · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116585NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01HL116585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to random motion of fetuses and maternal respirations, image quality of fetal brain MRIs varies considerably. To address this issue, visual inspection of the images is performed during acquisition phase and after 3D-reconstruction, and the images are re-acquired if they are deemed to be of insufficient quality. However, this process is time-consuming and subjective. Multi-instance (MI) deep learning methods (DLMs) may perform this task automatically. PURPOSE: To propose an MI count-based DLM (MI-CB-DLM), an MI vote-based DLM (MI-VB-DLM), and an MI feature-embedding DLM (MI-FE-DLM) for automatic assessment of 3D fetal-brain MR image quality. To quantify influence of fetal gestational age (GA) on DLM performance. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and seventy-one MR exams from 211 fetuses (mean GA ± SD = 30.9 ± 5.5 weeks). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T ASSESSMENT: The T STATISTICAL TESTS: DLM performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F-score, accuracy, and AUC values.

resultsPrecision, recall, F-score, accuracy, and AUC averaged over the three cross validations were 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.85 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.01, for MI-CB-DLM (without GA); 0.75 ± 0.03, 0.75 ± 0.03, 0.75 ± 0.03, 0.75 ± 0.03, 0.81 ± 0.03, for MI-VB-DLM (without GA); 0.81 ± 0.01, 0.81 ± 0.01, 0.81 ± 0.01, 0.81 ± 0.01, 0.89 ± 0.01, for MI-FE-DLM (without GA); and 0.86 ± 0.01, 0.86 ± 0.01, 0.86 ± 0.01, 0.86 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.01, for MI-CB-DLM with GA. DATA

conclusionMI-CB-DLM performed better than other DLMs. Including GA as an input of MI-CB-DLM improved its performance. MI-CB-DLM may potentially be used to objectively and rapidly assess fetal MR image quality. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBrainFetusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studiesdeep learningfetal brain MRIimage quality assessmentmulti-instance learningweakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33891778
PMCPMC13147238
OpenAlexW3154041150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.