Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891774›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Maternal and child genetic liability for smoking and caffeine consumption and child mental health: an intergenerational genetic risk score analysis in the ALSPAC cohort.

Laura Schellhas, Elis Haan, Kayleigh E Easey, Robyn E Wootton, Hannah M Sallis, Gemma C Sharp, Marcus R Munafò, Luisa Zuccolo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura SchellhasSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-4821
Elis HaanSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-1248
Kayleigh E EaseyMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3718-2915
Robyn E WoottonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-3202
Hannah M SallisSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gemma C SharpMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
Luisa ZuccoloMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Of Bristol Dental Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health Bristol Biomedical Research Centre at University HMedical Research Council G0902144Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/1Medical Research Council MR/S009310/1Medical Research Council MR/S036520/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 217065/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPrevious studies suggest an association between maternal tobacco and caffeine consumption during and outside of pregnancy and offspring mental health. We aimed to separate effects of the maternal environment (intrauterine or postnatal) from pleiotropic genetic effects.

designSecondary analysis of a longitudinal study. We (i) validated smoking and caffeine genetic risk scores (GRS) derived from published genome-wide association study (GWAS) for use during pregnancy, (ii) compared estimated effects of maternal and offspring GRS on childhood mental health outcomes and (iii) tested associations between maternal and offspring GRS on their respective outcomes.

settingWe used data from a longitudinal birth cohort study from England, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).

participantsOur sample included 7921 mothers and 7964 offspring. MEASUREMENTS: Mental health and non-mental health phenotypes were derived from questionnaires and clinical assessments: 79 maternal phenotypes assessed during and outside of pregnancy and 71 offspring phenotypes assessed in childhood (<10 years) and adolescence (11-18 years).

findingsThe maternal smoking and caffeine GRS were associated with maternal smoking and caffeine consumption during pregnancy (2nd trimester: P

conclusionsWe did not find strong evidence that maternal smoking and caffeine genetic risk scores have a causal effect on offspring mental health outcomes. Our results confirm that the smoking genetic risk scores also captures liability for sensation seeking personality traits.

Indexed as

CaffeineMental HealthCohort StudiesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMothersRisk FactorsSmokingCaffeineALSPACcaffeinegenetic risk scoreintergenerational effectsmental healthtobacco

Identifiers

PMID33891774
PMCPMC9376939
OpenAlexW3155104544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.