Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Personal attitude or experience? Which factors influence residents' acceptance of mixed-income communities?

Duc Trung Luu, Dao Chi Vo, Jeongseob Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duc Trung LuuDepartment of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2050-4033
Dao Chi VoDepartment of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.
Jeongseob KimDepartment of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9578-3348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many researchers and policy makers have argued that social mixing could contribute to sustainable communities, most people still prefer to live in a homogeneous rather than a diverse community. Considering the large gap between the political need for social mixing and people's preference, it is essential to understand residents' perceptions and preferences regarding socially-mixed neighborhoods in order to promote sustainable community development. This study explorers residents' willingness to accept living in mixed-income communities in Korea, with attention to various levels of income mix. This study conducted an online survey of 2,000 respondents living in seven metropolitan cities in Korea, including Seoul. The study aimed to investigate residents' comfortability and willingness to move into different mixed-income communities. The results showed that residents with higher openness to diversity are more likely to accept mixed-income communities, but frequent interaction with low-income people reduces higher-income people's willingness to accept mixed-income communities. As both personal attitudes and experience are important determinants of individuals' social mix preference, a more systematic community development strategy is required to achieve successful social mixing.

Indexed as

AttitudeResidence CharacteristicsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedConservation of Natural ResourcesFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedPoliticsPovertyRepublic of KoreaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33891648
PMCPMC8064591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.