Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891609›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Drug shortage management: A qualitative assessment of a collaborative approach.

Emily Chen, Susan Goold, Sam Harrison, Iman Ali, Ibtihal Makki, Stanley S Kent, Andrew G Shuman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Chemotherapeutic Shortages: How Do We Prioritize?Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022
    Article
  17. A Qualitative Study Exploring the Management of Medicine Shortages in the Community Pharmacy of Pakistan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Susan GooldUniversity of Michigan Medical School Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Sam HarrisonUniversity of Michigan Medical School Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Iman AliUniversity of Michigan Medical School Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Ibtihal MakkiUniversity of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Stanley S KentDepartment of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Andrew G ShumanUniversity of Michigan Medical School Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug shortages frequently and persistently affect healthcare institutions, posing formidable financial, logistical, and ethical challenges. Despite plentiful evidence characterizing the impact of drug shortages, there is a remarkable dearth of data describing current shortage management practices. Hospitals within the same state or region may not only take different approaches to shortages but may be unaware of shortages proximate facilities are facing. Our goal is to explore how hospitals in Michigan handle drug shortages to assess potential need for comprehensive drug shortage management resources. We conducted semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders throughout the state to describe experiences managing drug shortages, approaches to recent shortages, openness to inter-institutional engagement, ideas for a shared resource, and potential obstacles to implementation. To solicit additional feedback on ideas for a shared resource gathered from the interviews, we held focus groups with pharmacists, physicians, ethicists, and community representatives. Among participants representing a heterogeneous sample of institutions, three themes were consistent: (1) numerous drug shortage strategies occurring simultaneously; (2) inadequate resources and lead time to proactively manage shortages; and (3) interest in, but varied attitudes toward, a collaborative approach. These data provide insight to help develop and test a shared drug shortage management resource for enhancing fair allocation of scarce drugs. A shared resource may help institutions adopt accepted best practices and more efficiently access or share finite resources in times of shortage.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEvaluation Studies as TopicHospitalsHumansIntersectoral CollaborationMichiganPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacistsPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33891609
PMCPMC8064571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.