Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891583›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Avoiding organelle mutational meltdown across eukaryotes with or without a germline bottleneck.

David M Edwards, Ellen C Røyrvik, Joanna M Chustecki, Konstantinos Giannakis, Robert C Glastad, Arunas L Radzvilavicius, Iain G Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coevolution of Codependent Hosts and Symbionts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Sensitivity of genome-wide tests for mitonuclear genetic incompatibilities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mutation pressure, drift, and the pace of molecular coevolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David M EdwardsSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-2099
Ellen C RøyrvikDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Norway.
Joanna M ChusteckiSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1473-8415
Konstantinos GiannakisDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-6708
Robert C GlastadDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Norway.
Arunas L RadzvilaviciusDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Norway.
Iain G JohnstonDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8559-3519

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and plastid DNA (ptDNA) encode vital bioenergetic apparatus, and mutations in these organelle DNA (oDNA) molecules can be devastating. In the germline of several animals, a genetic "bottleneck" increases cell-to-cell variance in mtDNA heteroplasmy, allowing purifying selection to act to maintain low proportions of mutant mtDNA. However, most eukaryotes do not sequester a germline early in development, and even the animal bottleneck remains poorly understood. How then do eukaryotic organelles avoid Muller's ratchet-the gradual buildup of deleterious oDNA mutations? Here, we construct a comprehensive and predictive genetic model, quantitatively describing how different mechanisms segregate and decrease oDNA damage across eukaryotes. We apply this comprehensive theory to characterise the animal bottleneck with recent single-cell observations in diverse mouse models. Further, we show that gene conversion is a particularly powerful mechanism to increase beneficial cell-to-cell variance without depleting oDNA copy number, explaining the benefit of observed oDNA recombination in diverse organisms which do not sequester animal-like germlines (for example, sponges, corals, fungi, and plants). Genomic, transcriptomic, and structural datasets across eukaryotes support this mechanism for generating beneficial variance without a germline bottleneck. This framework explains puzzling oDNA differences across taxa, suggesting how Muller's ratchet is avoided in different eukaryotes.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisDNA, MitochondrialDrosophilaEukaryotaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic SpeciationGerm CellsGerm-Line MutationHumansMiceMitochondriaMitochondrial DynamicsModels, GeneticMutagenesisMutationDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID33891583
PMCPMC8064548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.