Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891356›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Colliding worlds: Family carers' experiences of balancing work and care in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Attracta Lafferty, Dominique Phillips, Linda Dowling-Hetherington, Majella Fahy, Breda Moloney, Clare Duffy, Gillian Paul, Gerard Fealy, Thilo Kroll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. How did the Sudden Closures of Adult Day Services During COVID-19 Impact Dementia Care Dyads?Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Attracta LaffertyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4042-9592
Dominique PhillipsUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Linda Dowling-HetheringtonUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Majella FahyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Breda MoloneyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Clare DuffyFamily Carers Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Gillian PaulUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerard FealyUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Thilo KrollUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEFamily Carers Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic public health and social protective measures imposed globally resulted in partial or full closure of key services and supports for services and supports for people with a disability, chronic illness or age-related dependency. This caused huge disruption to care provision and family carers were relied upon to assume this care at home. Many family carers, including those in employment, found themselves navigating additional care responsibilities without 'usual levels' of support from family, friends, work, school, day care services, homecare and community services. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family carers, their employment and care-giving responsibilities, through the lens of the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory (Hobfoll, 1989). Adopting a qualitative research approach, 16 family carers (14 females, 2 males) who were in employment prior to the onset of or during the pandemic, participated in an in-depth, semi-structured telephone or online video interview between June and September 2020. Interviews lasted between 45 and 100 min, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis of the interview data identified four main themes: colliding worlds; navigating unchartered waters alone; opportunity despite adversity and the relentless unknowing. Findings indicate that the onset of the pandemic resulted in the sudden loss of valued resources, which disrupted routines and caused care and work life domains to become intrinsically intertwined. Consistent with the main principles of the COR theory, adapting and transitioning to different ways of working and caring with depleted resources and supports, generated considerable stress for family carers and impacted their well-being. The implications for employers, healthcare providers, policy makers and other key stakeholders are considered, to enable family carers to successfully reconcile work with care and protect their well-being, as the pandemic continues to unfold and in the event of future societal crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19CaregiversFemaleHumansIrelandMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchConservation of Resources (COR) theoryCOVID-19employmentfamily carerspandemicqualitative researchworkforce

Identifiers

PMID33891356
PMCPMC8251184
OpenAlexW3154539766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.