ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2021
Deep Learning-Based Denoising in High-Speed Portable Reflectance Confocal Microscopy.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Portable Optical Microscopy Using Cloud Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optical imaging technologies forCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Confocal Microscopy for Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Malignancies: Clinical Impacts and Innovation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- In vivo microscopy as an adjunctive tool to guide detection, diagnosis, and treatment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Low-cost, chromatic confocal endomicroscope for cellular imagingBiomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePortable confocal microscopy (PCM) is a low-cost reflectance confocal microscopy technique that can visualize cellular details of human skin in vivo. When PCM images are acquired with a short exposure time to reduce motion blur and enable real-time 3D imaging, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is decreased significantly, which poses challenges in reliably analyzing cellular features. In this paper, we evaluated deep learning (DL)-based approach for reducing noise in PCM images acquired with a short exposure time. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND
methodsContent-aware image restoration (CARE) network was trained with pairs of low-SNR input and high-SNR ground truth PCM images obtained from 309 distinctive regions of interest (ROIs). Low-SNR input images were acquired from human skin in vivo at the imaging speed of 180 frames/second. The high-SNR ground truth images were generated by registering 30 low-SNR input images obtained from the same ROI and summing them. The CARE network was trained using the Google Colaboratory Pro platform. The denoising performance of the trained CARE network was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated by using image pairs from 45 unseen ROIs.
resultsCARE denoising improved the image quality significantly, increasing similarity with the ground truth image by 1.9 times, reducing noise by 2.35 times, and increasing SNR by 7.4 dB. Banding noise, prominent in input images, was significantly reduced in CARE denoised images. CARE denoising provided quantitatively and qualitatively better noise reduction than non-DL filtering methods. Qualitative image assessment by three confocal readers showed that CARE denoised images exhibited negligible noise more often than input images and non-DL filtered images.
conclusionsResults showed the potential of using a DL-based method for denoising PCM images obtained at a high imaging speed. The DL-based denoising method needs to be further trained and tested for PCM images obtained from disease-suspicious skin lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.