Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891311›Full record

Observational studyAnaesthesia2021

Decision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes for category-1 caesarean sections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

K Bhatia, M Columb, A Bewlay, N Tageldin, C Knapp, Y Qamar, A Dooley, P Kamath, M Hulgur, collaborators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

K BhatiaWythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-1196
M ColumbDepartment of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7837-4262
A BewlayDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-1665
N TageldinDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4070-0189
C KnappNorth West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK.
Y QamarNorth West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK.
A DooleyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9856-5488
P KamathDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK.
M HulgurDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Hospital Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7183-5334
collaborators *
Health Education North West · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBBolton NHS Foundation Trust · GBCollaborative Research Group · AULancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General anaesthesia is known to achieve the shortest decision-to-delivery interval for category-1 caesarean section. We investigated whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected the decision-to delivery interval and influenced neonatal outcomes in patients who underwent category-1 caesarean section. Records of 562 patients who underwent emergency caesarean section between 1 April 2019 and 1 July 2019 in seven UK hospitals (pre-COVID-19 group) were compared with 577 emergency caesarean sections performed during the same period during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 April 2020-1 July 2020) (post-COVID-19 group). Primary outcome measures were: decision-to-delivery interval; number of caesarean sections achieving decision-to-delivery interval < 30 min; and a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (Apgar 5-min score < 7, umbilical arterial pH < 7.10, neonatal intensive care unit admission and stillbirth). The use of general anaesthesia decreased significantly between the pre- and post-COVID-19 groups (risk ratio 0.48 (95%CI 0.37-0.62); p < 0.0001). Compared with the pre-COVID-19 group, the post-COVID-19 group had an increase in median (IQR [range]) decision-to-delivery interval (26 (18-32 [4-124]) min vs. 27 (20-33 [3-102]) min; p = 0.043) and a decrease in the number of caesarean sections meeting the decision-to-delivery interval target of < 30 min (374/562 (66.5%) vs. 349/577 (60.5%); p = 0.02). The incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes was similar in the pre- and post-COVID-19 groups (140/568 (24.6%) vs. 140/583 (24.0%), respectively; p = 0.85). The small increase in decision-to-delivery interval observed during the COVID-19 pandemic did not adversely affect neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingCOVID-19Pregnancy OutcomeAdolescentAdultAnesthesia, GeneralApgar ScoreCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsCOVID-19emergency caesarean sectionneonatal outcomeobstetrics anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID33891311
PMCPMC8251307
OpenAlexW3156314460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.