Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891259›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2021

Appendiceal goblet cell carcinomas have poor survival despite completion surgery.

Edward Alabraba, David Mark Pritchard, Rebecca Griffin, Rafael Diaz-Nieto, Melissa Banks, Daniel James Cuthbertson, Stephen Fenwick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward AlabrabaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom. edwardal@liv.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6611-687X
David Mark PritchardENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Rebecca GriffinLiverpool Clinical and Cancer Research UK Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Rafael Diaz-NietoENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Melissa BanksENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Daniel James CuthbertsonENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Stephen FenwickENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAppendiceal goblet cell carcinomas (aGCCs) are rare but aggressive tumours associated with significant mortality. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of aGCC patients treated at our tertiary referral centre.

methodsWe analysed aGCC patients, diagnosed between 1990-2016, assessing the impact of completion surgery and tumour factors on survival. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

resultsWe identified 41 patients (23 F, 18 M); median age 61 (range 27-79) years. Mean tumour size was 10.5 (range 0.5-50) mm; most tumours were located in the appendiceal tip (n = 18, 45%). Appendicectomy was the index surgery in 32 patients, 24 of whom subsequently underwent completion surgery at median 3 (range 1.3-13.3) months later. Histology from completion surgery showed residual disease in 8 patients: nodal disease (n = 2) or residual tumour (n = 6). Index surgery for the rest was either colectomy (n = 7) or cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) (n = 1). Index and completion surgery had 0% mortality and 2.5% morbidity. Overall and recurrence-free survival were not significantly affected by tumour grade or completion surgery. Disease recurred in 9 patients after a median follow-up of 57.0 (4.6-114.9) months; 7 of these patients died during follow-up. Recurrences were treated with CRS-HIPEC (n = 1), palliative chemotherapy (n = 3) or supportive care (n = 5). Five- and ten- year overall survival were 85.3% and 62.3% respectively; 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival were 73.6% and 50.6%.

conclusionThe prognosis of aGCCs remains relatively poor. Completion surgery did not prevent recurrence or improve survival, but this needs to be verified with a larger patient cohort. The high mortality associated with tumour recurrence questions current treatment recommendations.

Indexed as

Appendiceal NeoplasmsCarcinomaHyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedGoblet CellsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAppendicealAppendixCompletion right hemicolectomyCompletion surgeryGoblet cell carcinoidsGoblet cell carcinomas

Identifiers

PMID33891259
OpenAlexW3155425470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.