Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891228›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2022

The impacts of contact force, power and application time on ablation effect indicated by serial measurements of impedance drop in both conventional and high-power short-duration ablation settings of atrial fibrillation.

Li-Bin Shi, Yu-Chuan Wang, Song-Yun Chu, Alessandro De Bortoli, Peter Schuster, Eivind Solheim, Jian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Initial experience of temperature-controlled irrigated radiofrequency ablation for ischaemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li-Bin Shi *Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Yu-Chuan Wang *Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Song-Yun ChuDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Alessandro De BortoliDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Peter SchusterDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Eivind SolheimDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Jian ChenDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. jian.chen@med.uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3008-5706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to clarify the interrelationship and additive effects of contact force (CF), power and application time in both conventional and high-power short-duration (HPSD) settings.

methodsAmong 38 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent first-time pulmonary vein isolation, 787 ablation points were collected at the beginning of the procedure at separate sites. Energy was applied for 60 s under power outputs of 25, 30 or 35 W (conventional group), or 10 s when using 50 W (HPSD group). An impedance drop (ID) of 10 Ω was regarded as a marker of adequate lesion formation.

resultsID ≥ 10 Ω could not be achieved with CF < 5 g under any power setting. With CF ≥ 5 g, ID could be enhanced by increasing power output or prolonging ablation time. ID for 30 and 35 W was greater than for 25 W (p < 0.05). Ablation with 35 W resulted in greater ID than with 30 W only when CF of 10-20 g was applied for 20-40 s (p < 0.05). Under the same power output, ID increased with CF level at different time points. The higher the CF, the shorter the time needed to reach ID of 10 Ω and maximal ID. ID correlated well with ablation index under each power, except for lower ID values at 25 W. ID with 50 W for 10 s was equivalent to that with 25 W for 40 s, but lower than that with 30 W for 40 s or 35 W for 30 s.

conclusionsCF of at least 5 g is required for adequate ablation effect. With CF ≥ 5g, CF, power output, and ablation time can compensate for each other. Time to reach maximal ablation effect can be shortened by increasing CF or power. The effect of HPSD ablation with 50 W for 10 s is equivalent to conventional ablation with 25 W for 40 s and 30-35 W for 20-30 s in terms of ID.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsElectric ImpedanceHumansTreatment OutcomeAblation indexContact forceHigh-power short-durationPowerPulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID33891228
PMCPMC9399015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.