Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891212›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2021

Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia.

Mingna Liu, Weiyun Shi, Xin Liu, Na Li, Tong Chen, Hua Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted laserInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingna LiuEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Weiyun ShiEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Xin LiuEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Na LiEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Tong ChenEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Hua GaoEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China. gaohua100@126.com.
Shandong First Medical University · CNShandong Eye Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81530027National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870639Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province 201812150Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province (CN) 20150215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative corneal biomechanics and assess the influence factors after femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia. In this retrospective study, patients who completed 1-year follow-up were included. The corneal biomechanical parameters, including deformation amplitude ratio 2.0 mm (DA ratio 2.0 mm), integrated inverse radius (IntInv Rad), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), and Ambrosio relational thickness through the horizontal meridian (ARTh), were measured with Corvis STII. We also investigated the relationship between these biomechanics and preoperative or intraoperative variables. Thirty eyes had FS-LASIK and 30 eyes had LASEK. The changes in DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, and SP-A1 after surgery were significantly smaller in the LASEK group than in the FS-LASIK group, while the change in the ARTh was not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were detected in the mean values of postoperative DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, and SP-A1 between LASEK and FS-LASIK, while significant difference was detected in the mean value of postoperative ARTh. There was a significant correlation between the resident stromal bed thickness and the postoperative DA ratio 2.0 mm, IntInv Rad, or SP-A1. The postoperative ARTh has shown significant correlation with postoperative central corneal thickness and the amount of myopic correction. The effect of LASEK on corneal biomechanics was smaller than FS-LASIK when the same central corneal thickness was consumed. LASEK may be performed with a lower risk of postoperative corneal ectasia than FS-LASIK.

Indexed as

Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-AssistedKeratomileusis, Laser In SituMyopiaBiomechanical PhenomenaCorneaHumansLasers, ExcimerRetrospective StudiesCorneal biomechanics, Postoperative, Influencing factors, Femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis, Laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis

Identifiers

PMID33891212
OpenAlexW3154921872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.