Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891203›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Oncological and Operative Outcomes.

Joseph C Kong, Mikael Soucisse, Michael Michael, Jeanne Tie, Samuel Y Ngan, Trevor Leong, Jacob McCormick, Satish K Warrier, Alexander G Heriot

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06097416 (A Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomised Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06097416 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomised Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (NARCT) and Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) in Patients With T3 (a/b/c) Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. James's Hospital, IrelandRan2024 to 2030Enrolled100ConditionsRectal CancerArmsNeoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph C KongDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. joekong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-2480
Mikael Soucisse *Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael MichaelSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jeanne TieSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Samuel Y NganSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Trevor LeongSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jacob McCormickDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Satish K WarrierDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexander G HeriotDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer refers to the administration of chemoradiotherapy plus chemotherapy before surgery. Recent studies have shown improved pathological complete response and disease-free survival with this approach. However, survival benefits remain unproven. Our objective is to present a metaanalysis of oncological outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsA comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholars. Studies comparing total neoadjuvant therapy with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included. Data extracted from the individual studies were pooled and a metaanalysis performed. The outcomes of interest are the rate of complete pathological response, nodal response, resection margin, anal preservation, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

resultsThere were 15 comparative studies with 2437 patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 2284 in the total neoadjuvant therapy group. The pooled complete pathological response was 22.3% in the total neoadjuvant therapy group, compared with 14.2% in the standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Even though there was no difference in local recurrence rate, there was a significantly lower rate of distant recurrence (OR 0.81, p = 0.02), and better 3-year disease-free survival (70.6% vs. 65.3%, respectively, p < 0.001) and overall survival (84.9% vs. 82.3%, respectively, p = 0.006), favoring the total neoadjuvant therapy group. Due to significant heterogeneity in the study protocols, there remains uncertainty on the ideal chemotherapy/radiotherapy sequence.

conclusionsThis study provides supporting evidence on the favorable immediate and intermediate oncological outcomes with the use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRectumTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33891203
OpenAlexW3153756536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.