Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33891148›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2021

Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the prenatal diagnosis of common congenital vascular anomalies.

Laurence Crivelli, Anne-Elodie Millischer, Pascale Sonigo, David Grévent, Sylviane Hanquinet, Yvan Vial, Leonor Alamo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurence CrivelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. laurence.crivelli@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-0468
Anne-Elodie MillischerDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker - Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Pascale SonigoDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker - Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
David GréventDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker - Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Sylviane HanquinetDepartment of Radiology, HUG - Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.
Yvan VialDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Leonor AlamoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHHôpital Beau-Séjour · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening ultrasound (US) has increased the detection of congenital vascular anomalies in utero. Complementary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may improve the diagnosis, but its real utility is still not well established.

objectivesWe aimed to describe the imaging findings on prenatal US and MRI of the most frequent congenital vascular anomalies (lymphatic malformations and congenital hemangiomas) to assess the accuracy of prenatal US and MRI exams for diagnosis and to evaluate the relevance of the additional information obtained by complementary fetal MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll confirmed postnatal congenital vascular anomalies detected in the last 10 years at 3 university hospitals were retrospectively identified. The prenatal diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis for both methods and the clinical relevance of additional MRI information was evaluated. A second MRI in advanced pregnancy was performed in fetuses with lesions in a sensitive anatomical location and the clinical relevance of the additional information was evaluated.

resultsTwenty-four cases were included in the study, 20 lymphatic malformations and 4 hemangiomas. MRI slightly improved the diagnosis of lymphatic malformation, 85% vs. 80% at US, especially for abdominal lesions. Both methods had a low identification rate (25%) for tumors. MRI performed late in five fetuses with lymphatic malformation allowed optimized management at birth.

conclusionMRI improves the diagnosis of congenital lymphatic malformations whereas hemangiomas remain difficult to identify in utero. The main role of MRI is to provide high-defined anatomical data to guide management at birth.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleFetusHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCongenital hemangiomasFetusLymphatic malformationsMagnetic resonance imagingPrenatal diagnosisUltrasoundVascular anomalies

Identifiers

PMID33891148
PMCPMC8363547
OpenAlexW3155278279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.