Trial reportCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine2021
Prediction of Genotype Positivity in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Machine Learning.
Trial report in Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal artificial intelligence to predict cardiomyopathy development in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis.Open heart · 2026Article
- Integrating ECG Into the Mayo Score Enhances Genotype Prediction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: turns and loopholes.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Computer Vision Point of Care Decision Support of Echocardiographic Identification of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Role of Genetics in Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Glimpse into the Future.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Cardiovascular Diseases.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Genotype-Phenotype Taxonomy of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2023Article
- Genetic Testing in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Novel Morphological Features on CMR for the Prediction of Pathogenic Sarcomere Gene Variants in Subjects Without Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenetic testing can determine family screening strategies and has prognostic and diagnostic value in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, it can also pose a significant psychosocial burden. Conventional scoring systems offer modest ability to predict genotype positivity. The aim of our study was to develop a novel prediction model for genotype positivity in patients with HCM by applying machine learning (ML) algorithms.
methodsWe constructed 3 ML models using readily available clinical and cardiac imaging data of 102 patients from Columbia University with HCM who had undergone genetic testing (the training set). We validated model performance on 76 patients with HCM from Massachusetts General Hospital (the test set). Within the test set, we compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for the ML models against the AUROCs generated by the Toronto HCM Genotype Score (the Toronto score) and Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor (the Mayo score) using the Delong test and net reclassification improvement.
resultsOverall, 63 of the 178 patients (35%) were genotype positive. The random forest ML model developed in the training set demonstrated an AUROC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99) in predicting genotype positivity in the test set, significantly outperforming the Toronto score (AUROC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.90],
conclusionsOur ML models demonstrated a superior ability to predict genotype positivity in patients with HCM compared with conventional scoring systems in an external validation test set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.