Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33890823›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine2021

Prediction of Genotype Positivity in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Machine Learning.

Lusha W Liang, Michael A Fifer, Kohei Hasegawa, Mathew S Maurer, Muredach P Reilly, Yuichi J Shimada

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genotype-Phenotype Taxonomy of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Genetic Testing in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lusha W LiangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (L.W.L., M.S.M., M.P.R., Y.J.S.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Michael A FiferCardiology Division, Department of Medicine (M.A.F.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Kohei HasegawaDepartment of Emergency Medicine (K.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Mathew S MaurerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (L.W.L., M.S.M., M.P.R., Y.J.S.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Muredach P ReillyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (L.W.L., M.S.M., M.P.R., Y.J.S.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Yuichi J ShimadaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (L.W.L., M.S.M., M.P.R., Y.J.S.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Proteomics profiling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac event predictionR01HL157216 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHIMADA, YUICHI · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient Oriented Research in Geriatric CardiologyK24AG036778 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAURER, MATHEW S · 2010 to 2020
$1.6M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Cardiometabolic DiseaseK24HL107643 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2011 to 2020
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL107643NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157216NIA NIH HHS K24 AG036778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing can determine family screening strategies and has prognostic and diagnostic value in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, it can also pose a significant psychosocial burden. Conventional scoring systems offer modest ability to predict genotype positivity. The aim of our study was to develop a novel prediction model for genotype positivity in patients with HCM by applying machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsWe constructed 3 ML models using readily available clinical and cardiac imaging data of 102 patients from Columbia University with HCM who had undergone genetic testing (the training set). We validated model performance on 76 patients with HCM from Massachusetts General Hospital (the test set). Within the test set, we compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for the ML models against the AUROCs generated by the Toronto HCM Genotype Score (the Toronto score) and Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor (the Mayo score) using the Delong test and net reclassification improvement.

resultsOverall, 63 of the 178 patients (35%) were genotype positive. The random forest ML model developed in the training set demonstrated an AUROC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99) in predicting genotype positivity in the test set, significantly outperforming the Toronto score (AUROC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.90],

conclusionsOur ML models demonstrated a superior ability to predict genotype positivity in patients with HCM compared with conventional scoring systems in an external validation test set.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenotypeMachine LearningModels, GeneticAdultAgedCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscardiomyopathiesgenesgenotypemachine learningmutation

Identifiers

PMID33890823
PMCPMC8206028
OpenAlexW3152604983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.