ArticleGlobal spine journal2021
Bundled Payment Models in Spine Surgery.
Article in Global spine journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prior year hospital admission predicts 30-day hospital readmission after spine surgery.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Multimodal machine learning for risk-stratified bundled payments in spinal surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Savings Associated With Bundled Payments for Outpatient Spine Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Projections of single-level indirect lumbar interbody fusion volume and associated costs for Medicare patients to 2050.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Online access to spine care: do institutions advertise themselves as multidisciplinary?Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2022Article
- Profit-Influencing Factors in Orthopedic Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Reimbursements.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Volume and outcomes in posterior cervical fusion: Insights from a national inpatient analysis.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThe following is a narrative discussion of bundled payments in spine surgery.
objectiveThe cost of healthcare in the United States has continued to increase. To lower the cost of healthcare, reimbursement models are being investigated as potential cost saving interventions by driving incentives and quality improvement in fields such a spine surgery.
methodsNarrative overview of literature pertaining to bundled payments in spine surgery synthesizing findings from computerized databases and authoritative texts.
resultsSpine surgery is challenging to define payment modes because of high cost variability and surgical decision-making nuances. While implementing bundled care payments in spine surgery, it is important to understand concepts such as value-based purchasing, episodes of care, prospective versus retrospective payment models, one versus two-sided risk, risk adjustment, and outlier protection. Strategies for implementation underscore the importance of risk stratification and modeling, adoption of evidence based clinical pathways, and data collection and dissemination. While bundled care models have been successfully implemented, challenges facing institutions adopting bundled care payment models include financial stressors during adoption of the model, distribution of risks, incentivization of treating only low risk patients, and nuanced variation in procedures leading to variation in costs.
conclusionAn alternative for fee for service payments, bundled care payments may lead to higher cost savings and surgeon accountability in a patient's care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.