Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33890801›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2021

Bundled Payment Models in Spine Surgery.

Kevin Hines, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Charles Getz, Glenn Gonzalez, Thiago Montenegro, Adam Leibold, James Harrop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Profit-Influencing Factors in Orthopedic Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Reimbursements.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin HinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-174X
Nikolaos MouchtourisDepartment of Neurosurgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-9391
Charles GetzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Glenn GonzalezDepartment of Neurosurgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thiago MontenegroDepartment of Neurosurgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adam LeiboldDepartment of Neurosurgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James HarropDepartment of Neurosurgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designThe following is a narrative discussion of bundled payments in spine surgery.

objectiveThe cost of healthcare in the United States has continued to increase. To lower the cost of healthcare, reimbursement models are being investigated as potential cost saving interventions by driving incentives and quality improvement in fields such a spine surgery.

methodsNarrative overview of literature pertaining to bundled payments in spine surgery synthesizing findings from computerized databases and authoritative texts.

resultsSpine surgery is challenging to define payment modes because of high cost variability and surgical decision-making nuances. While implementing bundled care payments in spine surgery, it is important to understand concepts such as value-based purchasing, episodes of care, prospective versus retrospective payment models, one versus two-sided risk, risk adjustment, and outlier protection. Strategies for implementation underscore the importance of risk stratification and modeling, adoption of evidence based clinical pathways, and data collection and dissemination. While bundled care models have been successfully implemented, challenges facing institutions adopting bundled care payment models include financial stressors during adoption of the model, distribution of risks, incentivization of treating only low risk patients, and nuanced variation in procedures leading to variation in costs.

conclusionAn alternative for fee for service payments, bundled care payments may lead to higher cost savings and surgeon accountability in a patient's care.

Indexed as

bundled paymentcost savingsepisode of carequality improvementspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID33890801
PMCPMC8076809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.