ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2021
Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.
Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of artificial intelligence for sepsis risk prediction after flexible ureteroscopy: a systematic review.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a multi-model teaching strategy to train emergency medicine residents to use point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for assessment of shock.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Clinical efficacy of ulinastatin in the treatment of unliquefied pyogenic liver abscess complicated by septic shock: A randomized controlled trial.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Trial
- Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein-Albumin-Lymphocyte Index for Multiple Organ Failure Syndrome in Elderly Patients with Sepsis.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Review
- CSTA and DDX24: potential biomarkers regulating ferroptosis in sepsis and their diagnostic value.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Awareness and management of sepsis among emergency medicine practitioners in China: a national cross-sectional study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- A Mini-Review of Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing in Sepsis in the Emergency Department.EJIFCC · 2026Review
- Liberal Versus Restrictive Fluid Therapy in the Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Relationship between red cell distribution width to albumin ratio (RAR) and mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-associated ARDS: a retrospective study based on MIMIC-IV.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Bioactive adrenomedullin as a point-of-care biomarker in emergency department patients with suspected severe infections: an exploratory analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Establishment and validation of a rat sepsis model aligned with sepsis-3 via Staphylococcus aureus tail vein infection.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The role of immunomodulatory nano systems in the treatment of sepsis: past, present, and future.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Article
- The value of proportion of perfused vessels change rate in the evaluation of early organ function deterioration in septic shock and ARDS.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a prognostic model for sepsis based on gut microbiota-associated genes and identification of potential targets.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: FatalFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Histone Deacetylase Activity Model for the Discovery and Validation of Sepsis Biomarkers.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Hematocrit and 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated septic patients: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early management of sepsis and septic shock is crucial for patients' prognosis. As the Emergency Department (ED) is the place where the first medical contact for septic patients is likely to occur, emergency physicians play an essential role in the early phases of patient management, which consists of accurate initial diagnosis, resuscitation, and early antibiotic treatment. Since the issuing of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in 2016, several studies have been published on different aspects of sepsis management, adding a substantial amount of new information on the pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis and septic shock. In light of this emerging evidence, the present narrative review provides a comprehensive account of the recent advances in septic patient management in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.