Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33890198›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2021

Point-of-care manufacturing: a single university hospital's initial experience.

Jose Antonio Calvo-Haro, Javier Pascau, José Manuel Asencio-Pascual, Felipe Calvo-Manuel, Maria José Cancho-Gil, Juan Francisco Del Cañizo López, María Fanjul-Gómez, Roberto García-Leal, Guillermo González-Casaurrán, Manuel González-Leyte and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Does using 3D printed models for pre-operative planning improve surgical outcomes of foot and ankle fracture fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Point-of-Care Orthopedic Oncology Device Development.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jose Antonio Calvo-HaroAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. calvoharo@yahoo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-7572
Javier PascauInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Asencio-PascualAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Felipe Calvo-ManuelClínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Maria José Cancho-GilAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Francisco Del Cañizo LópezAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
María Fanjul-GómezAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto García-LealAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo González-CasaurránAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel González-LeyteAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Antonio León-LuisAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Lydia Mediavilla-SantosAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Santiago Ochandiano-CaicoyaAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Ramón Pérez-CaballeroAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Ribed-SánchezAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Río-GómezAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo Sánchez-PérezAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Serrano-AndreuClínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Tousidonis-RialAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Vaquero-MartínAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Sonia García San JoséAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Perez-MañanesAdvanced Planning and 3D Manufacturing Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PI18/01625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of 3D printing technology in hospitals is evolving toward production models such as point-of-care manufacturing. This study aims to present the results of the integration of 3D printing technology in a manufacturing university hospital.

methodsObservational, descriptive, retrospective, and monocentric study of 907 instances of 3D printing from November 2015 to March 2020. Variables such as product type, utility, time, or manufacturing materials were analyzed.

resultsOrthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Gynecology and Obstetrics are the medical specialties that have manufactured the largest number of processes. Working and printing time, as well as the amount of printing material, is different for different types of products and input data. The most common printing material was polylactic acid, although biocompatible resin was introduced to produce surgical guides. In addition, the hospital has worked on the co-design of custom-made implants with manufacturing companies and has also participated in tissue bio-printing projects.

conclusionsThe integration of 3D printing in a university hospital allows identifying the conceptual evolution to "point-of-care manufacturing."

Indexed as

3D printingBiomodelCustom implantsManufacturing university hospitalPOC manufacturingPreoperative planningSurgical guides

Identifiers

PMID33890198
PMCPMC8061881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.