SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2023
A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in child and youth mental health: synthesising the use of theory, intervention functions, and behaviour change techniques.
Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jointly held care documents in child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators to The Involvement of Under-Represented Children and Young People (aged 8-25) in Mental Health Research - a Systematic Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Conflicted Anger as a Central Dynamic in Depression in Adolescents-A Double Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Development of Let's Get REAL: A Family Intervention for Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy Decisions.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Factors influencing shared decision-making and decision regret in parents of children undergoing myopia control within one year.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A scoping review on adaptations incorporated into decision aids for children and adolescents (C&A) cohorts.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
- Cultural impacts on shared decision-making: A cross-European study of psychiatrist preferences in 38 countries.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Article
- Decision-making for children and adolescents: a scoping review of interventions increasing participation in decision-making.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Struggling to be heard: A scoping review of user participation in ADHD mental healthcare for children and adolescents.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2025Review
- Youth Perspectives on 'Highly Personalised and Measurement-Based Care': Qualitative Co-Design of Education Materials.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Addressing the complexity of child psychiatry practice in the current landscape.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2023Article
- Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- CARIBOU-1: A pilot controlled trial of an Integrated Care Pathway for the treatment of depression in adolescents.JCPP advances · 2022Article
- Predictors, Moderators, and Mediators Associated With Treatment Outcome in Randomized Clinical Trials Among Adolescents With Depression: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reviews around interventions to improve shared decision making (SDM) for child and youth mental health have produced inconclusive findings on what approaches increase participation. Importantly, the previous reviews did not explore the use of theory, as well as mechanisms of change (intervention functions) and active units of change (behaviour change techniques). The aim of this review was to explore these factors and ascertain how, if at all, these contribute to SDM. Five databases were searched up until April 2020. Studies met inclusion criteria if they were: (a) an intervention to facilitate SDM; (b) aimed at children, adolescence, or young people aged up to 25, with a mental health difficulty, or their parents/guardians; and (c) included a control group. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, study design, intervention, theoretical background, intervention functions, behaviour change techniques, and SDM. Quality assessment of the studies was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. Eight different interventions met inclusion criteria. The role of theory to increase SDM remains unclear. Specific intervention functions, such as 'education' on SDM and treatment options and 'environmental restructuring' using decision aids, are being used in SDM interventions, as well as 'training' for clinicians. Similarly, behaviour change techniques linked to these, such as 'adding objects to the environment', 'discussing pros/cons', and clinicians engaging in 'behavioural practice/rehearsal'. However, as most studies scored low on the quality assessment criteria, as well as a small number of studies included and a low number of behaviour change techniques utilised, links between behaviour change techniques, intervention functions and increased participation remain tentative. Intervention developers and clinicians may wish to consider specific intervention functions and behaviour change techniques to facilitate SDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.