Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33890169›Full record

SynthesisCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Treatment of Gastric Varices: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Murad M Alqadi, Sakshum Chadha, Shovik S Patel, Yi-Fan Chen, Ron C Gaba

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endohepatology: The endoscopic armamentarium in the hand of the hepatologist.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Management of Patients With Gastric Varices.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Murad M AlqadiDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago, MC 931, 1740 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Sakshum ChadhaRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Shovik S PatelRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Yi-Fan ChenCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Ron C GabaDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine University of Illinois at Chicago, MC 931, 1740 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. rgaba@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-1576
University of Illinois Chicago · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify the pooled clinical outcomes of stent-graft transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for the management of gastric varices (GVs) through systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA PubMed and Embase search was performed from 2003 to 2020. Search terms included: (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt OR TIPS) AND (gastric varices OR fundal varices OR gastroesophageal varices OR gastroesophageal varices) AND (hemorrhage OR rebleeding OR rebleeding OR survival). Inclusion criteria spanned: English language studies, publication in peer reviewed journals, sample size ≥ 10, reported clinical outcome data, exclusive treatment of GVs (no esophageal varices), exclusive use of stent-grafts for TIPS, no chemical obliteration of GVs. Outcomes included GV rebleeding rate, overall rebleeding rate, GV occlusion rate, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) incidence, and adverse event (AE) rate.

resultsLiterature search yielded 936 articles. Of these, 5 (0.5%) retrospective observational cohort studies met inclusion criteria, spanning 209 patients (quinquagenarian men with viral or alcoholic liver disease) with GVs treated using TIPS with adjunctive coil embolization (47%). Clinical follow-up time ranged from 4.3 to 30.6 months. Outcomes included a pooled GV rebleeding rate of 15% (95% CI: 11%, 20%), total rebleeding rate of 21% (95% CI: 15%, 27%), GV occlusion rate of 33% (95% CI: 22%, 45%), HE incidence of 30% (95% CI: 24%, 36%), and AE incidence of 3% (95% CI: 1%, 8%).

conclusionThe incidence of GV rebleeding after stent-graft TIPS is high. The results suggest the need for additional measures to reduce recurrent hemorrhage incidence from GVs.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesEsophagusGastric FundusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticTreatment OutcomeClinical outcomesGastric varices (GVs)Meta-analysisRebleedingTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

Identifiers

PMID33890169
OpenAlexW3155517799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.