Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33890119›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021

Optimising sample preparation for FTIR-based microplastic analysis in wastewater and sludge samples: multiple digestions.

Serena Cunsolo, John Williams, Michelle Hale, Daniel S Read, Fay Couceiro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Riverine Microplastic Pollution: Insights from Cagayan de Oro River, Philippines.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Microplastic Pollution: Chemical Characterization and Impact on Wildlife.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serena CunsoloSchool of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH, UK. serena.cunsolo@port.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-2661
John WilliamsSchool of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH, UK.
Michelle HaleSchool of the Environment Geography and Geosciences, Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, UK.
Daniel S ReadUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK.
Fay CouceiroSchool of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH, UK.
University of Portsmouth · GBUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of standardised methodologies in microplastic research has been addressed in recent years as it hampers the comparison of results across studies. The quantification of microplastics in the environment is key to the assessment of the potential eco-toxicological impacts that this new category of emerging pollutants could have on terrestrial and aquatic species. Therefore, the need for protocols that are robust, simple and reliable together with their standardisation are of crucial importance. This study has focused on removal of organic matter with Fenton reagent from wastewater and sludge samples. This step of analysis was optimised by implementing a multi-digestion treatment on these samples that have high concentration of complex mixtures of organic matter, which interfere with microplastic enumeration. Moreover, this study targeted the detection of microplastics in the sub-hundred-micron size range due to the potential higher risks associated with smaller-sized particles and the limited data available from previous wastewater research. To show the validity of the method, triplicate samples of raw sewage, final effluent and sludge were independently spiked with two different sizes and types of microplastic polymers. Due to the various analytical stages required for the isolation of microplastics, time is a limiting factor in sample processing. The sequential digestion with Fenton reagent represents an inexpensive and time-efficient procedure for wastewater research providing effective degradation of organic material. These advantages over other currently available methods mean the method is suitable for analysis of large numbers of samples allowing robust monitoring data sets to be generated.

Indexed as

ExtractionMicroplasticsOrganic matterRecoveryWastewaterWet peroxide oxidation

Identifiers

PMID33890119
PMCPMC8141486
OpenAlexW3154316052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.