ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2021
How understudied populations have contributed to our understanding of Alzheimer's disease genetics.
Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Alzheimer's disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic targets.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals APOE genotype-dependent sex differences in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- High burden of variants of uncertain significance in early-onset colorectal cancer among indigenous African patients: a call for global research equity in cancer genetics.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Ancestry-specific gene expression in peripheral monocytes mediates risk of neurodegenerative disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Aging, Race, and Health Disparities: Recommendations From the Research Centers Collaborative Network.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024Article
- Creating diverse and inclusive scientific practices for research datasets and dissemination.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Editorial: Insights in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: 2022.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Transfer learning for genotype-phenotype prediction using deep learning models.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Validation of the Norma Latina Neuropsychological Assessment Battery in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease in Mexico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Comprehensive short and long read sequencing analysis for the Gaucher and Parkinson's disease-associated GBA gene.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Genome-wide association of polygenic risk extremes for Alzheimer's disease in the UK Biobank.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Editorial: Insights in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- A comprehensive analysis of copy number variation in a Turkish dementia cohort.Human genomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The majority of genome-wide association studies have been conducted using samples with a broadly European genetic background. As a field, we acknowledge this limitation and the need to increase the diversity of populations studied. A major challenge when designing and conducting such studies is to assimilate large samples sizes so that we attain enough statistical power to detect variants associated with disease, particularly when trying to identify variants with low and rare minor allele frequencies. In this review, we aimed to illustrate the benefits to genetic characterization of Alzheimer's disease, in researching currently understudied populations. This is important for both fair representation of world populations and the translatability of findings. To that end, we conducted a literature search to understand the contributions of studies, on different populations, to Alzheimer's disease genetics. Using both PubMed and Alzforum Mutation Database, we systematically quantified the number of studies reporting variants in known disease-causing genes, in a worldwide manner, and discuss the contributions of research in understudied populations to the identification of novel genetic factors in this disease. Additionally, we compared the effects of genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms across populations by focusing on loci that show different association profiles between populations (a key example being APOE). Reports of variants in APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2 can initially determine whether patients from a country have been studied for Alzheimer's disease genetics. Most genome-wide significant associations in non-Hispanic white genome-wide association studies do not reach genome-wide significance in such studies of other populations, with some suggesting an opposite effect direction; this is likely due to much smaller sample sizes attained. There are, however, genome-wide significant associations first identified in understudied populations which have yet to be replicated. Familial studies in understudied populations have identified rare, high effect variants, which have been replicated in other populations. This work functions to both highlight how understudied populations have furthered our understanding of Alzheimer's disease genetics, and to help us gauge our progress in understanding the genetic architecture of this disease in all populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.