Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889861›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2021

Retrospective observational RT-PCR analyses on 688 babies born to 843 SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers, placental analyses and diagnostic analyses limitations suggest vertical transmission is possible.

G Bahadur, M Bhat, S Acharya, D Janga, B Cambell, J Huirne, W Yoong, A Govind, J Pardo, R Homburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

G BahadurReproductive Medicine Unit/Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
M BhatAyrshire Fertility Unit, University Hospital Crosshouse, Kilmarnock, Scotland.
S AcharyaAyrshire Fertility Unit, University Hospital Crosshouse, Kilmarnock, Scotland.
D JangaReproductive Medicine Unit/Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
B CambellReproductive Medicine Unit/Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
J HuirneUniversity Medical Centers Amsterdam, Research Institute Reproduction and Development. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W YoongReproductive Medicine Unit/Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
A GovindReproductive Medicine Unit/Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
J PardoReproductive Medicine Unit/Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK.
R HomburgHomerton Fertility Unit, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London E9 6SR,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionIs there vertical transmission (from mother to baby antenatally or intrapartum) after SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infected pregnancy? STUDY

designA systematic search related to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), pregnancy, neonatal complications, viral and vertical transmission. The duration was from December 2019 to May 2020.

resultsA total of 84 studies with 862 COVID positive women were included. Two studies had ongoing pregnancies while 82 studies included 705 babies, 1 miscarriage and 1 medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP). Most publications (50/84, 59.5%), reported small numbers (<5) of positive babies. From 75 studies, 18 babies were COVID-19 positive. The first reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) diagnostic test was done in 449 babies and 2 losses, 2nd RT-PCR was done in 82 babies, IgM tests were done in 28 babies, and IgG tests were done in 28 babies. On the first RT-PCR, 47 studies reported time of testing while 28 studies did not. Positive results in the first RT-PCR were seen in 14 babies. Earliest tested at birth and the average time of the result was 22 hours. Three babies with negative first RT-PCR became positive on the second RT-PCR at day 6, day 7 and at 24 hours which continued to be positive at 1 week.Four studies with a total of 4 placental swabs were positive demonstrating SARS-CoV-2 localised in the placenta. In 2 studies, 10 tests for amniotic fluid were positive for SARS-CoV-2. These 2 babies were found to be positive on RT-PCR on serial testing.

conclusionDiagnostic testing combined with incubation period and placental pathology indicate a strong likelihood that intrapartum vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) from mother to baby is possible.

Indexed as

COVID-19pregnancyrisksSARS-CoV-2vertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID33889861
PMCPMC8051196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.