Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889858›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2021

Prognosis in fertilisation rate and outcome in IVF cycles in patients with and without endometriosis: a population-based comparative cohort study with controls.

J Metzemaekers, Eer Lust, Jpt Rhemrev, N Van Geloven, Arh Twijnstra, L Van Der Westerlaken, F W Jansen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Endometriosis and In Vitro Fertilization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Endometriosis, Oocyte, and Embryo Quality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J MetzemaekersDepartment of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Eer LustDepartment of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jpt RhemrevDepartment of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum-Bronovo, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
N Van GelovenDepartment of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arh TwijnstraDepartment of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
L Van Der WesterlakenDepartment of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
F W JansenDepartment of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLDelft University of Technology · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubfertility occurs in 30-40% of endometriosis patients. Regarding the fertilisation rate with in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and endometriosis, conflicting data has been published. This study aimed to compare endometriosis patients to non-endometriosis cycles assessing fertilisation rates in IVF.

methodsA population-based cohort study was conducted at the Leiden University Medical Center. IVF cycles of endometriosis patients and controls (unexplained infertility and tubal pathology) were analysed. The main outcome measurement was fertilisation rate.

results503 IVF cycles in total, 191 in the endometriosis group and 312 in the control. The mean fertilisation rate after IVF did not differ between both groups, 64.1%±25.5 versus 63.9%±24.8 (p=0.95) respectively, independent of age and r-ASRM classification. The median number of retrieved oocytes was lower in the endometriosis group (7.0 versus 8.0 respectively, p=0.19) and showed a significant difference when corrected for age (p=0.02). When divided into age groups, the statistical effect was only seen in the group of ≤ 35 years (p=0.04). In the age group ≤35, the endometriosis group also showed significantly more surgery on the internal reproductive organs compared to the control group (p<0.001). All other outcomes did not show significant differences.

conclusionSimilar fertilisation rates were found in endometriosis IVF cycles compared to controls. The oocyte retrieval was lower in the endometriosis group, however this effect was only significant in the age group ≤ 35 years. All other secondary outcomes did not show significant differences. In general, endometriosis patients with an IVF indication can be counselled positively regarding the chances of becoming pregnant, and do not need a different IVF approach.

Indexed as

Endometriosisfertilisation rateIVFzona pellucida

Identifiers

PMID33889858
PMCPMC8051192
OpenAlexW3146949380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.