Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889808›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of criminology2018

Monetary Sanctions: Legal Financial Obligations in US Systems of Justice.

Karin D Martin, Bryan L Sykes, Sarah Shannon, Frank Edwards, Alexes Harris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of criminology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
47.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Legal Financial Obligations: An Understudied Public Health Exposure.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The long-term impact of debt relief for indigent defendants in a misdemeanor court.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karin D MartinDaniel J. Evans School of Public Policy & Governance, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Bryan L SykesDepartment of Criminology, Law and Society, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
Sarah ShannonDepartment of Sociology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Frank EdwardsBronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA.
Alexes HarrisDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-3340, USA.
University of Washington · USCornell University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review assesses the current state of knowledge about monetary sanctions, e.g., fines, fees, surcharges, restitution, and any other financial liability related to contact with systems of justice, which are used more widely than prison, jail, probation, or parole in the United States. The review describes the most important consequences of the punishment of monetary sanctions in the United States, which include a significant capacity for exacerbating economic inequality by race, prolonged contact and involvement with the criminal justice system, driver's license suspension, voting restrictions, damaged credit, and incarceration. Given the lack of consistent laws and policies that govern monetary sanctions, jurisdictions vary greatly in their imposition, enforcement, and collection practices of fines, fees, court costs, and restitution. A review of federally collected data on monetary sanctions reveals that a lack of consistent and exhaustive measures of monetary sanctions presents a unique problem for tracking both the prevalence and amount of legal financial obligations (LFOs) over time. We conclude with promising directions for future research and policy on monetary sanctions.

Indexed as

fineslegal financial obligationsmonetary sanctions

Identifiers

PMID33889808
PMCPMC8059707
OpenAlexW2762455919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.