Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889731›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2021

Geisinger's effort to realize its potential as a learning health system: A progress report.

F Daniel Davis, Marc S Williams, Rebecca A Stametz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Catalyzing dementia care through the learning health system and consumer health information technology.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F Daniel DavisCenter for Translational Bioethics and Healthcare Policy Danville Pennsylvania USA.
Marc S WilliamsGenomic Medicine Institute Danville Pennsylvania USA.
Rebecca A StametzSteele Institute for Health Innovation Danville Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the last two decades, several organizational initiatives have moved Geisinger into closer alignment with the key characteristics of the learning health system (LHS) model. The intent of this experience report is to provide a firsthand view of the potential of the model and of the complex, multifaceted nature of any endeavor designed and implemented to realize that potential.

methodsAfter describing Geisinger, we offer a critical self-assessment of our progress toward the goal of becoming an LHS, followed by an account of the challenges.

resultsGeisinger has made incremental but measurable progress in implementing the LHS model, especially in two key domains: in patient-clinician engagement and science and informatics. Other challenges, however, present significant opportunities for additional forward movement, especially with respect to incentives, culture, and leadership.

conclusionBecoming a fully realized LHS is and will be a long-term challenge for any organization that embraces this aspiration.

Indexed as

learning health systemorganizational culturepatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID33889731
PMCPMC8051344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.