Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889730›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2021

European survey on national harmonization in clinical research.

Annette Magnin, Valentina Cabral Iversen, Gonzalo Calvo, Beata Čečetková, Ola Dale, Regina Demlová, György Blaskó, Fionnuala Keane, Gabor L Kovacs, Claire Levy-Marchal and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Annette MagninSCTO-Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation Bern Switzerland.
Valentina Cabral IversenNorCRIN-Norwegian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Trondheim Norway.
Gonzalo CalvoSCReN-Spanish Clinical Research Network Madrid Spain.
Beata ČečetkováSLOVACRIN-Slovak Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Košice Slovakia.
Ola DaleNorCRIN-Norwegian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Trondheim Norway.
Regina DemlováCZECRIN-Czech Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Brno Czech Republic.
György BlaskóHECRIN-Hungarian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Pécs Hungary.
Fionnuala KeaneHRB CRCI-Health Research board, Clinical Research Coordination Dublin Ireland.
Gabor L KovacsHECRIN-Hungarian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Pécs Hungary.
Claire Levy-MarchalF-CRIN-French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Toulouse France.
Emilia C MonteiroPtCRIN-Portuguese Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Lisbon Portugal.
Lucia PalmisanoItaCRIN-Italian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Rome Italy.
Daniel PellaSLOVACRIN-Slovak Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Košice Slovakia.
Antonio PortolésSCReN-Spanish Clinical Research Network Madrid Spain.
Olivier RascolF-CRIN-French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Toulouse France.
Caecilia SchmidSCTO-Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation Bern Switzerland.
Fabian TaySCTO-Swiss Clinical Trial Organisation Bern Switzerland.
Heiko von der LeyenKKSN-Netzwerk der Koordinierungszentren für Klinische Studien Berlin Germany.
Christian OhmannECRIN-European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network Paris France.
French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network · FRSlovak Public Health Association · SKSpanish Clinical Research Network · ESCzech Education and Scientific Network · CZEuropean Clinical Research Infrastructure Network · FRHealth Research Board · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials remain key to the development of evidence-based medical practice. However, they are becoming increasingly complex, mainly in a multinational setting. To address these challenges, the European Union (EU) adopted the Clinical Trial Regulation EU No. 536/2014 (CTR). Once in force, the CTR will lead to more consistent rules and simplification of procedures for conducting clinical trials throughout the EU. Existing harmonization initiatives and "research infrastructures" for clinical trials may facilitate this process. This publication offers a snapshot of the current level of harmonization activities in academic clinical research in Europe.

methodsA survey was performed among the member and observer countries of the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN), using a standardized questionnaire. Three rounds of data collection were performed to maximize completeness and comparability of the received answers. The survey aimed to describe the harmonization of academic clinical research processes at national level, to facilitate the exchange of expertise and experience among countries, and to identify new fields of action.

resultsMost scientific partners already have in place various working groups and harmonization activities at national level. Furthermore, they are involved in and open to sharing their know-how and documents. Since harmonization was mainly a bottom-up approach up until now, the extent and topics dealt with are diverse and there is only little cross-networking and cross-country exchange so far.

conclusionsCurrently, the ECRIN member countries offer a very solid base and collaborative spirit for further aligning processes and exchanging best practices for clinical research in Europe. They can support a smooth implementation of the EU CTR and may act as single contact with consolidated expertise in a country.

Indexed as

clinical researchclinical studyclinical trialECRINEU 536/2014harmonization of processessurvey

Identifiers

PMID33889730
PMCPMC8051345
OpenAlexW3007221032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.