Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889639›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Quadriceps Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With Uninjured Matched Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Conlan Brown, Lee Marinko, Michael P LaValley, Deepak Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Conlan BrownDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lee MarinkoDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael P LaValleyDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Deepak KumarDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Mind Your Walk Intervention for Community-Based Management of Knee OA: A Feasibility StudyK01AR069720 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KUMAR, DEEPAK · 2017 to 2021
$676k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR069720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe limb symmetry index may overestimate the recovery of quadriceps muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison of individuals who have had anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with age-, sex-, and activity-matched individuals might be more appropriate to guide rehabilitation interventions. PURPOSE: To compare the quadriceps strength between the injured limb of people with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the limb of an age-, sex-, and activity-matched control group. STUDY

designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsMEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and SPORTDiscus were searched between inception and April 2019. Studies were included if they reported the peak quadriceps strength for persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and age-, sex-, and activity-matched control groups measured using isometric or isokinetic dynamometry. Risk of bias was assessed, and meta-analyses and metaregression (for effect of time since surgery) were performed.

resultsA total of 2759 studies were identified and 21 were included for analyses. Quadriceps strength was lower in the limbs with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with the limb from matched controls within 6 months of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (standardized mean difference [SMD], -1.42; 95% CI, -1.62 to -1.23), 6 to 18 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SMD, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.66), and >18 to 48 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, -0.79 to 0.03). Results of the metaregression were significant, with the difference between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and matched controls decreasing with time since surgery (

conclusionIn people with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the injured limb had lower quadriceps strength compared with the limb of age-, sex-, and activity-matched controls up to 4 years after surgery. Clinicians should consider comparison with matched cohorts for return to sports decision making.

Indexed as

ACLlimb symmetry indexrehabilitationreturn to sports

Identifiers

PMID33889639
PMCPMC8040575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.