Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33889381›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Möbius Band Surprise: A Systematic Illusion in Imagery.

Mons Daniel Haugland, David G Pearson, Vebjørn Ekroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mons Daniel HauglandDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5686-3492
David G PearsonSchool of Psychology and Sports Science, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-0976
Vebjørn EkrollDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9383-7322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a Möbius loop is cut along the middle of the band, the result is a single connected loop, yet anecdotal evidence from science demonstrations and the use of this effect in magic tricks suggest that most people are thoroughly surprised by this because they strongly believe that the result should be two separate loops. Here, we present results from a behavioral experiment confirming this anecdotal evidence and discuss potential theoretical explanations for why this demonstration evokes strong, but misleading intuitions and a related illusion of impossibility.

Indexed as

attribute substitutioncognitive failurecognitive illusionconnectednessmagic trickMöbius bandspatial reasoningvisual imagery

Identifiers

PMID33889381
PMCPMC8040567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.