ArticleDental research journal
Is there a change in the mandibular cortical shape index in panoramic radiographs over time? A longitudinal retrospective study.
Article in Dental research journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Fractal Analysis on Orthopantomography Images of Bone Remodeling Changes at 3 Months Between Natural Socket Healing and Immediate Implant Placement.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of Osteoporosis with Tooth Loss and Dental Radiomorphometric Indices.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- General and local predictors of mandibular cortical bone morphology in adult females and males: the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA longitudinal study design was conducted to assess the mandibular cortical shape index (CI) in panoramic radiographs retrospectively. An association between age and a deterioration of different radiological parameters on panoramic radiographs was stated in cross-sectional studies. As longitudinal studies are rare, this one is designed to assess radiological changes over time. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this longitudinal study, The archive of the dentomaxillofacial radiology department was searched for panoramic radiographs of patients who have two radiographs with a time lapse of at least 15 years between both. The radiographs were then examined and the CI was categorized into three categories: normal, mild, and severely eroded. The following factors were examined to determine if they had an effect on possible changes of the CI using the Chi-square test: The time period between both radiographs, the gender and the age of the subjects when both radiographs were made also compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
resultsNinety radiographs met the inclusion criteria. The mean age, when the 1
conclusionIn this longitudinally designed study, a deterioration of the CI over time when assessing the nonstandardized panoramic radiographs could be confirmed. This study shows that 68.9% of the patients had CI deterioration of at least one category over the average time of 17.96 years. This is the first study to quantify the CI deterioration over time to our knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33889353PMC8045519W3110815361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.