ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2021
Multinational survey on the preferred approach to management of Barrett's esophagus in the Asia-Pacific region.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Many Biopsies Are Enough? Rethinking Biopsy and Surveillance Strategies for Barrett's Esophagus in Asia.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Evaluation of the Gastroesophageal Junction and Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus.Digestion · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor societies provide differing guidance on management of Barrett's esophagus (BE), making standardization challenging.
aimTo evaluate the preferred diagnosis and management practices of BE among Asian endoscopists.
methodsEndoscopists from across Asia were invited to participate in an online questionnaire comprising eleven questions regarding diagnosis, surveillance and management of BE.
resultsFive hundred sixty-nine of 1016 (56.0%) respondents completed the survey, with most respondents from Japan (
conclusionDiagnosis and management of BE varied within Asia, with stark contrast between Japan and outside Japan. Most Asian endoscopists chose squamo-columnar junction to be the landmark for esophagogastric junction, which is incorrect. Most also did not consistently use Prague criteria, and Seattle protocol. Lack of standardization, education and research are possible reasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.