ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2021
Basic neonatal resuscitation: retention of knowledge and skills of primary health care workers in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Southern Nigeria.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal resuscitation in Eastern Africa: health care providers' level of knowledge and its determinants. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Global health action · 2024Pooled it
- Neonatal Resuscitation Practices and Associated Factors Among Nurses in Tanzanian Delivery Suites: A Cross-Sectional Study.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
- Mentees' Perspectives on the Factors that influence the Choice of Mentors in the Medical Profession.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
- Effectiveness of Neonatal Resuscitation Program in Improving Knowledge and Skills Among Nursing Officers Working in Maternal and Child Health Wards.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionbirth attendants' retention of knowledge and skills of neonatal resuscitation post-training can prevent birth asphyxia by repeatedly applying neonatal resuscitation guidelines. This study assessed primary healthcare workers' retention of knowledge and skills of basic neonatal resuscitation.
methodsin 28 primary health centres, 106 birth attendants had their knowledge and skills assessed following a one-day neonatal resuscitation training. The evaluation was before, immediately after training, at three months (a subset of participants) and six months. Paired t-tests were used to compare mean scores at two different evaluation times.
resultsthe mean baseline knowledge and skills scores were 35.22% ± 12.90% and 21.40% ± 16.91% respectively. Immediately after training, it increased to 81.48% ± 7.05% and 87.40% ± 13.97% respectively (p=0.0001). At three months, it decreased to 55.37% ± 20.50% and 59.11% ± 25.55% respectively (p=0.0001), at six months it was 55.77% ± 14.28% and 60.38% ± 19.79% respectively (p=0.0001). Following immediate post-training at 6 months, knowledge and skills scores increased to 94.91 ± 7.28% and 96.02 ± 4.50% respectively (p=0.0001). No participant had adequate knowledge and one had adequate skills at baseline. The proportion of those with adequate knowledge and skills markedly increased immediate post-training but decreased remarkably at three-month and at six-month evaluations respectively. 99.1% had adequate knowledge and all had adequate skills immediate post-training at 6 months.
conclusionneonatal resuscitation training led to an improvement in knowledge and skills with suboptimal retention at three to six months post-training. Re-training improved knowledge and skills. We recommend that the retention of knowledge and skills could improve by retraining and mentoring at least 3-6 monthly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.