ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021
Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
- Spontaneous SSCD Auto-Plugging: Clinical, Electrophysiological and Radiological Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Round Window Reinforcement for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.The journal of international advanced otology · 2025Article
- Is CT Still the Gold Standard in Semicircular Canal Dehiscence? Diagnostic Value of MRI in Poschl and Stenver Planes.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance as Screening Tools for Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Observational
- Arcuate eminence distance to temporal bone outer table in the middle fossa repair of superior canal dehiscence.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- [A case of adult temporal bone langerhans cell histiocytosis presenting as posterior canal dehiscence syndrome and literature review].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- The Third Mobile Window Syndrome: A Clinical Spectrum of Different Anatomical Locations-Characterization, Therapeutic Response, and Implications in the Development of Endolymphatic Hydrops.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Superior semicircular canal dehiscence in relation with the superior petrosal sinus: our experience, surgical management and systematic review of literature.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Observational
- Survey of Wideband Acoustic Immittance Use by Clinical Audiologists.American journal of audiology · 2024Article
- Scuba Diving-Induced Inner-Ear Pathology: Imaging Findings of Superior Semicircular Canal and Tegmen Tympani Dehiscence.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Predictors of non-primary auditory and vestibular symptom persistence following surgical repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The Rise and Fall of Aural Acoustic Immittance Assessment Tools.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Investigation of Third Window Symptoms in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Pilot Study.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.