ArticleCancer management and research2021
Machine Learning Models to Improve the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: A Multicenter External Validation Study.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03080623 (Ultrasound-based Diagnostic Model for Differentiating Malignant Breast Lesion From Benign Lesion), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound-based Diagnostic Model for Differentiating Malignant Breast Lesion From Benign Lesion
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prediction models for differentiating benign from malignant liver lesions based on multiparametric dual-energy non-contrast CT.European radiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- Ultrasound-based deep learning in the establishment of a breast lesion risk stratification system: a multicenter study.European radiology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound: From Diagnosis to Prognosis-A Rapid Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to establish and evaluate the usefulness of a simple, practical, and easy-to-promote machine learning model based on ultrasound imaging features for diagnosing breast cancer (BC). MATERIALS AND
methodsLogistic regression, random forest, extra trees, support vector, multilayer perceptron, and XG Boost models were developed. The modeling data set of 1345 cases was from a tertiary class A hospital in China. The external validation data set of 1965 cases were from 3 tertiary class A hospitals and 2 primary hospitals. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the main evaluation index, and pathological biopsy was used as the gold standard for evaluating each model. Diagnostic capability was also compared with that of clinicians.
resultsAmong the six models, the logistic model showed superior diagnostic efficiency, with an AUC of 0.771 and 0.906 and Brier scores of 0.181 and 0.165 in the test and validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the clinician diagnosis and the logistic model were 0.913 and 0.906. Their AUCs in the tertiary class A hospitals were 0.915 and 0.915, respectively, and were 0.894 and 0.873 in primary hospitals, respectively.
conclusionThe externally validated logical model can be used to distinguish between malignant and benign breast lesions in ultrasound images. Compared with clinician diagnosis, the logistic model has better diagnostic efficiency, making it potentially useful to assist in screening, particularly in lower level medical institutions.
trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03080623.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.