ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021
Comparison of Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients with Hepatobiliary Malignancies Based on XGBoost and LASSO-Logistic Algorithms.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpretable machine learning model based on non-contrast computed tomography within 24 hours of admission for early prediction of the risk of severe deterioration of acute pancreatitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure in the ICU.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Regulation of calcium homeostasis by S100A12 drives NETosis in chronic kidney disease.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Is Systematic Biopsy Mandatory in All MRI-Guided Fusion Prostate Biopsies? A Machine Learning Prediction Model.Cancers · 2026Article
- Predictors of cough resolution following endoscopic minimally invasive treatment in patients with GERD and chronic cough: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Method for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice: a retrospective matched cohort study.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Re-examining the association between region-specific pain recurrence and muscle force strategies in patients with patellofemoral pain via OpenSim and artificial intelligence: a prospective cohort study toward targeted rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Classifying metro drivers' cognitive distractions during manual operations using machine learning and random forest-recursive feature elimination.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning algorithms to predict heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among patients with premature myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of rapid and effective risk prediction models for stroke in the Chinese population: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization for heart failure: an in silico model using routinely collected health data to emulate a clinical trial.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Machine learning for acute kidney injury: Changing the traditional disease prediction mode.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on the admission data, we applied the XGBoost algorithm to create a prediction model to estimate the AKI risk in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies and then compare its prediction capacity with the logistic model.
methodsWe reviewed clinical data of 7968 and 589 liver/gallbladder cancer patients admitted to Zhongshan Hospital during 2014 and 2015. They were randomly divided into the training set and test set. Data were collected from the electronic medical record system. XGBoost and LASSO-logistic were used to develop prediction models, respectively. The performance measures included the classification matrix, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), lift chart and learning curve.
resultsOf 6846 participants in the training set, 792 (11.6%) cases developed AKI. In XGBoost model, the top 3 most important variables for AKI were serum creatinine (SCr), glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and antitumor treatment in liver cancer patients. Similarly, SCr and eGFR also ranked second and third most important variables in the gallbladder cancer-related AKI model just after phosphorus. In the classification matrix, XGBoost model possessed a comparably better agreement between the actual observations and the predictions than LASSO-logistic model. The Youden's index of XGBoost model was 47.5% and 59.3%, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of LASSO-logistic model (41.6% and 32.7%). The AUCs of XGBoost model were 0.822 in liver cancer and 0.850 in gallbladder cancer. By comparison, the AUC values of Logistic models were significantly lower as 0.793 and 0.740 (p=0.024 and 0.018). With the accumulation of training samples, XGBoost model maintained greater robustness in the learning curve.
conclusionXGBoost model based on admission data has higher accuracy and stronger robustness in predicting AKI. It will benefit AKI risk classification management in clinical practice and take an advanced intervention among patients with hepatobiliary malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.