ArticleScientific reports2021
Deep learning can accelerate and quantify simulated localized correlated spectroscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mid-infrared wearable biosensing for metabolic syndrome: Opportunities and translational challenges.iScience · 2026Review
- Spectral Representation of Neurochemicals With Phase, Frequency Offset, and Lineshape Invariance: Application to JPRESS for In Vivo Concentration and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of a deep learning method QNet and LCModel for MRS quantification on the cloud computing platform CloudBrain-MRS.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- AI-enabled multimodal neuroimaging for neurotransmitter mapping in normal aging and age-related disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- MRS-Sim: Open-Source Framework for Simulating In Vivo-Like Magnetic Resonance Spectra.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Quantification of spatially localized MRS by a novel deep learning approach without spectral fitting.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Label-Free Chemically and Molecularly Selective Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2023Review
- Application of aImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- In vivo magnetic resonanceMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Subnormothermic Ex Vivo Porcine Kidney Perfusion Improves Energy Metabolism: Analysis UsingTransplantation direct · 2022Article
- Emerging MR Imaging and Spectroscopic Methods to Study Brain Tumor Metabolism.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) allows for the determination of atomic structures and concentrations of different chemicals in a biochemical sample of interest. MRS is used in vivo clinically to aid in the diagnosis of several pathologies that affect metabolic pathways in the body. Typically, this experiment produces a one dimensional (1D)
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.