ArticleScientific reports2021
Consumption of caffeinated beverages and kidney function decline in an elderly Mediterranean population with metabolic syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coffee intake, genetic variants, and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional analysis of the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) study.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Association between coffee and caffeine consumption and chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Acute Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Postural Balance, Functional Capacity and Cognitive Function in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Diet quality in relation to kidney function and its potential interaction with genetic risk of kidney disease among Dutch post-myocardial infarction patients.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Coffee Intake, Plasma Caffeine Levels, and Kidney Function: Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Among East Asian and European Ancestries.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal factors behind diabetic nephropathy: evidence, opportunities, and challenges.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- CYP1A2 Genetic Variation, Coffee Intake, and Kidney Dysfunction.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Coffee intake and risk of diabetic nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Caffeine intake improves the cognitive performance of patients with chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Causal Association Between Tea Consumption and Kidney Function: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It remains unclear whether caffeinated beverages could have deleterious renal effects in elderly population with underlying comorbid conditions. We investigated the associations between coffee, tea, or caffeine intake and 1-year changes in glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a large Spanish cohort of overweight/obese elderly with metabolic syndrome (MetS). This prospective analysis includes 5851 overweight/obese adults (55-75 years) with MetS from the PREDIMED-Plus study. We assessed coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption from a validated food-frequency questionnaire and creatinine-based eGFR using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Multivariate-adjusted regression models were applied to test associations between baseline coffee, tea, or caffeine intake and 1-year eGFR changes. Caffeinated coffee (> 2 cups/day) and tea (at least 1 cup/day) drinkers had 0.88 and 0.93 mL/min/1.73 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.