ArticleScientific reports2021
Computational and experimental mechanical performance of a new everolimus-eluting stent purpose-built for left main interventions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- How plaque morphology and stenosis severity govern stent-artery interaction and deployment outcomes: a computational study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Rapid coronary artery stent computational simulation using the simplex deformable model.Medical engineering & physics · 2026Article
- Postdilation Strategies Following Provisional Stenting of Left Main Coronary Bifurcations: Insights From Patient-Specific Computational Simulations.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- "Roundabout" Bailout Stenting for Subacute Right Coronary Artery Obstruction After Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of Different Double-Stent Implantation Techniques on Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Finite Element Analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Drug-Coated Cardiovascular Devices: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Patient-specific coronary angioplasty simulations - A mixed-dimensional finite element modeling approach.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Artery Interventions: Preprocedural Planning and Procedural Assistance.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Interventions With Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- The everolimus eluting Synergy MegatronCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2023Article
- DES Selection for Left Main and Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Importance of optimal rewiring guided by 3-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging during double-kissing culotte stenting demonstrated through a novel bench model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Magnetic and Biocompatible Polyurethane Nanofiber Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2023Article
- Article
- First-in-Human Computational Preprocedural Planning of Left Main Interventions Using a New Everolimus-Eluting Stent.JACC. Case reports · 2022Article
- Patient-specific computational simulation of coronary artery bifurcation stenting.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left main (LM) coronary artery bifurcation stenting is a challenging topic due to the distinct anatomy and wall structure of LM. In this work, we investigated computationally and experimentally the mechanical performance of a novel everolimus-eluting stent (SYNERGY MEGATRON) purpose-built for interventions to large proximal coronary segments, including LM. MEGATRON stent has been purposefully designed to sustain its structural integrity at higher expansion diameters and to provide optimal lumen coverage. Four patient-specific LM geometries were 3D reconstructed and stented computationally with finite element analysis in a well-validated computational stent simulation platform under different homogeneous and heterogeneous plaque conditions. Four different everolimus-eluting stent designs (9-peak prototype MEGATRON, 10-peak prototype MEGATRON, 12-peak MEGATRON, and SYNERGY) were deployed computationally in all bifurcation geometries at three different diameters (i.e., 3.5, 4.5, and 5.0 mm). The stent designs were also expanded experimentally from 3.5 to 5.0 mm (blind analysis). Stent morphometric and biomechanical indices were calculated in the computational and experimental studies. In the computational studies the 12-peak MEGATRON exhibited significantly greater expansion, better scaffolding, smaller vessel prolapse, and greater radial strength (expressed as normalized hoop force) than the 9-peak MEGATRON, 10-peak MEGATRON, or SYNERGY (p < 0.05). Larger stent expansion diameters had significantly better radial strength and worse scaffolding than smaller stent diameters (p < 0.001). Computational stenting showed comparable scaffolding and radial strength with experimental stenting. 12-peak MEGATRON exhibited better mechanical performance than the 9-peak MEGATRON, 10-peak MEGATRON, or SYNERGY. Patient-specific computational LM stenting simulations can accurately reproduce experimental stent testing, providing an attractive framework for cost- and time-effective stent research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.