Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888692›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Machine learning guided aptamer refinement and discovery.

Ali Bashir, Qin Yang, Jinpeng Wang, Stephan Hoyer, Wenchuan Chou, Cory McLean, Geoff Davis, Qiang Gong, Zan Armstrong, Junghoon Jang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Innovations in Aptamer Technology: SELEX To Intelligent Molecular Engineering and Clinical Translation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ali Bashir *Google Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Qin Yang *Aptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-2464
Jinpeng WangAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Stephan HoyerGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5207-0380
Wenchuan ChouAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Cory McLeanGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Geoff DavisGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Qiang GongAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Zan ArmstrongGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5231-7470
Junghoon JangAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Hui KangAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Annalisa PawloskyGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Alexander ScottAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
George E DahlGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0083-844X
Marc BerndlGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6750-5861
Michelle DimonGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA. mdimon@google.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9889-8626
B Scott FergusonAptitude Medical Systems Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA. scott.ferguson@aptitudemedical.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6224-388X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acid ligands that bind to target molecules with high affinity and specificity. They are typically discovered by searching large libraries for sequences with desirable binding properties. These libraries, however, are practically constrained to a fraction of the theoretical sequence space. Machine learning provides an opportunity to intelligently navigate this space to identify high-performing aptamers. Here, we propose an approach that employs particle display (PD) to partition a library of aptamers by affinity, and uses such data to train machine learning models to predict affinity in silico. Our model predicted high-affinity DNA aptamers from experimental candidates at a rate 11-fold higher than random perturbation and generated novel, high-affinity aptamers at a greater rate than observed by PD alone. Our approach also facilitated the design of truncated aptamers 70% shorter and with higher binding affinity (1.5 nM) than the best experimental candidate. This work demonstrates how combining machine learning and physical approaches can be used to expedite the discovery of better diagnostic and therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAptamers, NucleotideComputer SimulationDrug DiscoveryGene LibraryLigandsLipocalin-2Models, ChemicalProtein BindingAptamers, NucleotideLigandsLipocalin-2

Identifiers

PMID33888692
PMCPMC8062585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.