ArticleBMJ open2021
Swiss-wide multicentre evaluation and prediction of core outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: protocol for the ARCR_Pred cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04321005 (Surgical Safety and Effectiveness in Orthopedics), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Surgical Safety and Effectiveness in Orthopedics: Swiss-wide Multicenter Evaluation and Prediction of Core Outcomes in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Reconstruction
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The shoulder stiffness scale: a validated tool for monitoring stiffness in arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstructions.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of articular-sided, bursal-sided, and intratendinous partial rotator cuff tears: outcomes of surgical repair from a multicenter cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Quantitative fat-fraction analysis of the rotator cuff muscles on clinical sagittal and coronal T1-weighted MRI using deep learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Return to sport after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: epidemiology and prognostic factors in a Swiss multicentre cohort.British journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Update of a prediction model for postoperative shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Rotator Cuff Muscular Edema in Human: A Clinical and Radiological Analysis From the LaTour Group.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of biceps tenotomy/tenodesis on Popeye sign incidence and functional outcome.JSES international · 2025Article
- Article
- Safety of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: using a core event set for clinician and patient assessment of risks in a multicenter cohort study.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2025Article
- Understanding preoperative health-related quality of life in rotator cuff tear patients: role of patients' characteristics.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Traumatic and Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have the Same Rates of Healing.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Functional and Radiologic Outcomes of Degenerative Versus Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Supraspinatus Tendon.The American journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Development and internal validation of a model predicting patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Swiss setting.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2023Article
- Concordance of shoulder strength assessments using a spring balance and isometric dynamometer in patients before and after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.JSES international · 2023Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Segmentation of the Shoulder from MRI with Inference Accuracy Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prognostic factors for improvement of shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.JSES international · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 16 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the field of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), reporting standards of published studies differ dramatically, notably concerning adverse events (AEs). In addition, prognostic studies are overall methodologically poor, based on small data sets and explore only limited numbers of influencing factors. We aim to develop prognostic models for individual ARCR patients, primarily for the patient-reported assessment of shoulder function (Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)) and the occurrence of shoulder stiffness 6 months after surgery. We also aim to evaluate the use of a consensus core event set (CES) for AEs and validate a severity classification for these events, considering the patient's perspective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cohort of 970 primary ARCR patients will be prospectively documented from several Swiss and German orthopaedic clinics up to 24 months postoperatively. Patient clinical examinations at 6 and 12 months will include shoulder range of motion and strength (Constant Score). Tendon repair integrity status will be assessed by ultrasound at 12 months. Patient-reported questionnaires at 6, 12 and 24 months will determine functional scores (subjective shoulder value, OSS), anxiety and depression scores, working status, sports activities, and quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level questionnaire). AEs will be documented according to a CES. Prognostic models will be developed using an internationally supported regression methodology. Multiple prognostic factors, including patient baseline demographics, psychological, socioeconomic and clinical factors, rotator cuff integrity, concomitant local findings, and (post)operative management factors, will be investigated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project contributes to the development of personalised risk predictions for supporting the surgical decision process in ARCR. The consensus CES may become an international reference for the reporting of complications in clinical studies and registries. Ethical approval was obtained on 1 April 2020 from the lead ethics committee (EKNZ, Basel, Switzerland; ID: 2019-02076). All participants will provide informed written consent before enrolment in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04321005. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2 (13 December 2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.