Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888529›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Experiences along the diagnostic pathway for patients with advanced lung cancer in the USA: a qualitative study.

Morhaf Al Achkar, Monica Zigman Suchsland, Fiona M Walter, Richard D Neal, Bernardo H L Goulart, Matthew J Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A qualitative study of interactions with oncologists among patients with advanced lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Morhaf Al AchkarDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA alachkar@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4160-0550
Monica Zigman SuchslandDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7007-6973
Fiona M WalterDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-6476
Richard D NealUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-2744
Bernardo H L GoulartFood and Drug Adminstration, Washington, DC, USA.
Matthew J ThompsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-8444

Funding

Cancer Research UK C8640/A23385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with lung cancer are diagnosed at advanced stages. However, the advent of oral targeted therapies has improved the prognosis of many patients with lung cancer. PURPOSE: We aimed to understand the diagnostic experiences of patients with advanced lung cancer with oncogenic mutations.

methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic alterations. Patients were recruited from online support groups within the USA. Interviews were conducted remotely or in person. Analysis used an iterative inductive and deductive process. Themes were mapped to the Model for Pathways to Treatment.

results40 patients (12 male and 28 female) with a median age of 48 were included. We identified nine distinct themes. During the 'patient interval', individuals became concerned about symptoms, but often attributed them to other causes. Prolonged or more severe symptoms prompted care-seeking. During the 'primary care interval', doctors initially treated for illnesses other than cancer. Discovery of an imaging abnormality was a turning point in diagnostic pathways. Occasionally, severity of symptoms prompted patients to seek emergency care. During the 'secondary care interval', obtaining tissue samples was pivotal in confirming diagnosis. Delays in accessing oncology care sometimes led to patient distress. Obtaining genetic testing was crucial in directing patients to receive targeted treatments.

conclusionsPatients experienced multiple different routes to their diagnosis. Some patients perceived delays, inefficiencies and lack of coordination, which could be distressing. Shifting the stage of diagnosis of lung cancer to optimise the impact of targeted therapies will require concerted efforts in early detection.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSecondary Health CareUnited Statescancer geneticsqualitative researchrespiratory tract tumours

Identifiers

PMID33888529
PMCPMC8070881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.