Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888488›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes.

Louise Ferrall, Ken Y Lin, Richard B S Roden, Chien-Fu Hung, T-C Wu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
208citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

208 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 382 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louise FerrallDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ken Y LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8516-7971
Richard B S RodenDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chien-Fu HungDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
T-C WuDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. wutc@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WARNER KING HUH, TZYY-CHOOU WU · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
Mouse modeling of HPV infectionR01CA233486 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUNG, CHIEN-FU, RODEN, RICHARD BRUCE · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Development of Novel Spontaneous HPV Cervicovaginal Carcinoma Models for Cancer ImmunotherapyR01CA237067 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WU, TZYY-CHOOU · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233486NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a sad fact that despite being almost completely preventable through human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening, cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer to affect women worldwide. Persistent high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection is the primary etiologic factor for cervical cancer. Upward of 70% of cases are driven by HPV types 16 and 18, with a dozen other hrHPVs associated with the remainder of cases. Current standard-of-care treatments include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or surgical resection. However, they have significant side effects and limited efficacy against advanced disease. There are a few treatment options for recurrent or metastatic cases. Immunotherapy offers new hope, as demonstrated by the recent approval of programmed cell death protein 1-blocking antibody for recurrent or metastatic disease. This might be augmented by combination with antigen-specific immunotherapy approaches, such as vaccines or adoptive cell transfer, to enhance the host cellular immune response targeting HPV-positive cancer cells. As cervical cancer progresses, it can foster an immunosuppressive microenvironment and counteract host anticancer immunity. Thus, approaches to reverse suppressive immune environments and bolster effector T-cell functioning are likely to enhance the success of such cervical cancer immunotherapy. The success of nonspecific immunostimulants like imiquimod against genital warts also suggest the possibility of utilizing these immunotherapeutic strategies in cervical cancer prevention to treat precursor lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) and persistent hrHPV infections against which the licensed prophylactic HPV vaccines have no efficacy. Here, we review the progress and challenges in the development of immunotherapeutic approaches for the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyFemaleHumansUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33888488
PMCPMC8448896
OpenAlexW3156577277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.